 NerdtalkerWorking Hard, Or Hardly Working?Premium,MVM
join:2003-02-18
Tucson, AZ | reply to Trillionare
Re: [Connectivity] Motorola 5100 vs. 5120 SB5100
• Has some upstream issues in ex-attbi areas, possibly firmware related
• Broadcom chipset handles noise better, and is thus hardier in 256QAM environments
SB5120
• Doesn't have the same upstream issues the SB5100 has (as far as I know)
• TI (Texas Instruments) chipset is more susceptible to noise related issues, especially in a 256QAM modulated plant
--
"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn
I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com
Spam: 8800+ messages currently using 268 MB (11%) of my 2442 MB |
|
|
|
| said by Nerdtalker:SB5100 • TI (Texas Instruments) chipset is more susceptible to noise related issues, especially in a 256QAM modulated plant Could you expound on that? Noise from what? Is there something I should be keeping it away from? And what's a "modulated plant"?
Incidentally, I note that I have firmware "SB5120-2.9.2.10-SCM03-NOSH," and I've seen references to it going back to last year. If it's still current, I guess they don't update it very often. |
|
NerdtalkerWorking Hard, Or Hardly Working?Premium,MVM
join:2003-02-18
Tucson, AZ | said by rseiler:Could you expound on that? Noise from what? Is there something I should be keeping it away from? And what's a "modulated plant"? Noise as in low SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio). It just isn't as good at handling excessive noise (below 33dB) when the downstream channel is using 256QAM for modulation as the SB5100's broadcom chipset is.
Plant is just a term for cable system.
--
"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn
I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com
Spam: 8800+ messages currently using 268 MB (11%) of my 2442 MB |
|
