B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28
| Re: NAT Challenge
Well yeah, but the cool part of the challenge should be that the leet hackerz don't have to reveal how they did it -- all they have to do is... do it!
We don't want to give them any excuse not to demonstrate their leetitude.
-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function | |
|
 
Link Logger
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
Calgary, AB
 ·Shaw
| Re: NAT Challenge said by B  :Well yeah, but the cool part of the challenge should be that the leet hackerz don't have to reveal how they did it -- all they have to do is... do it! If requested I would be happy to keep the attack technique confidential except for the fact that it worked, what ever it takes to prove or disprove how safe NAT devices are, as that is ultimate goal of this challenge.
Blake
--
Vendor: Firewall Logging Software »www.SonicLogger.com - SonicWall and 3Com »www.LinkLogger.com - Linksys, Netgear and Zyxel | |
|
 | 
Gelroos
Mad Mage
Premium
join:2003-05-23
Wilmington, DE | Re: NAT Challenge Well if you are going to be so considerate LL, All you have to do is go to a specified URL running a specified browser and click on a specified link...Then click the run button  | |
|
| | |
| | | 
ntguru911
join:2001-03-26
Powell, OH
| Re: NAT Challenge I'm not sure if you're serious about working for a very large bank or not but if you are shouldn't we be using the correct terminology--PAT (port address translation)which is what all these devices are, at least in default out-of-the-box configuration? | |
|
|
|
|
