site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Hijack This logs? ·Panda Free Tools ·Vundo Removal
AuthorAll Replies


justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
New York, NY
kudos:7
Host:
IPv6
Business Connectiv..
Console/Handheld g..
Home/Office setup ..
Photos of Broadban..

reply to dave

Re: DRM implementors == black hats

I'm sure microsoft has a division that works with media companies to help with their DRM needs. Do you know for sure that microsoft recommends a different way to do DRM that is not so difficult to remove? perhaps they actively help companies do it the evil way. After all - their roadmap for DRM is to make it part and parcel with not just the OS but tbe silicon. Why would microsoft be interested in transparency on the subject?

dave
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-04
not in ohio
kudos:7
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·Verizon Online DSL

I'm not sure what Microsoft has to do with this.

You'd hope that if Microsoft were somehow behind this, they'd use programmers who had more of a clue than those responsible for the mess that Russinovich ran into. I can't see anyone on the NT core team doing such a poor job. That "check every N seconds" nonsense smacks of someone whose expertise is in not-very-good user-mode apps.

You're right that Microsoft can of course implement irremovable DRM simply by, for example, embedding it in the kernel image. But that doesn't seem to be relevant to this case.


Monday, 04-Jun 00:00:27 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics