Reviews:
 ·Comcast
| Windows .NET Framework 2.0 Showed up for me today on Windows Update. How is it working so far for you early adopters? Any issues?
Thanks.
"The .NET Framework version 2.0 improves scalability and performance with improved caching, application deployment and updating with ClickOnce, and support for the broadest array of browsers and devices with ASP.NET 2.0 controls and services." |
|
|
|
 CudniLa Merma - VigiladoPremium,MVM
join:2003-12-20
Someshire
kudos:13 | One thing annoyed me was the loss of mscorcfg.msc which now is supplied in SDK
Cudni
--
....nothing but a well informed optimistHelp yourself so God can help you |
|
| Thanks for that fast reply. Since I have never heard of that file, I don't suppose I will miss it. 
I am mainly interested in any program incompatibilities that have arisen. |
|
CudniLa Merma - VigiladoPremium,MVM
join:2003-12-20
Someshire
kudos:13 | reply to Oregonian
Only this one so far
»support.microsoft.com/kb/907417
"..
Microsoft has released an update for Microsoft Office Excel 2003 and for Microsoft Office Word 2003. This update corrects a potential problem in which an add-in, a smart tag, or a smart document may not load if the add-in, smart tag, or smart document uses the Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0. ..."
Cudni
--
....nothing but a well informed optimistHelp yourself so God can help you |
|
| Yes, I actually got that update yesterday. Thanks for posting it, though.
I think I'll let .NET 2.0 percolate a bit longer before I install it.
Thanks for the help. |
|
 Lex LuthorPremium,Mod
join:2000-09-17
Hicksville, NY
kudos:3 | We still need to keep .NET 1.1 on our PCs for compatibility with order .NET programs, is that correct?
Would be nicer (cleaner) if we could uninstall .NET 1.1 first. |
|
bk9410
join:2002-12-25
Yorktown Heights, NY | reply to Oregonian
That software update won't take on my PC for some reason.
I wonder what's going on. |
|
tjackPremium
join:2003-10-13
Buffalo, NY | reply to Oregonian
After installing NET Framework 2.0 I ran Norton's System Works check-up. It found ten errors relating to a missing "msvcr80.dll" under program integrity. I searched my computer and found it, but not in the System32 folder. I googled for info and found others with a similar problem but not related to NET Framework 2.0. Their "msvcr80.dll" was in the same place as mine. When they copied it to the System32 folder they no longer had errors in their applications. At this point I deleted 2.0 and will wait and see what happens. |
|
 SkipdawgThe OriginalPremium,ExMod 2001-03
join:2001-04-19
Mount Vernon, WA | reply to Oregonian
Well so far no problems here. WinXP sp2  |
|
Angst4
join:2005-11-14
El Cajon, CA | reply to tjack
Exact same problem here...same 10 errors and no hint on net or on Symantec's site. Please do let me know if you find any info on this issue. Thanks. |
|
tjackPremium
join:2003-10-13
Buffalo, NY | reply to Oregonian
I haven't found a mention of it anywhere. If I do I'll post. |
|
| reply to tjack
Ditto.... SAme problem here....Norton System Works finds ten errors - missing msvcr80.dll needed for Net 2.0 etc etc... I am afraid to delete the Net 2.0 for fear of losing a shared .dll file or something and wrecking connectivity...so ..please post anything you find on this that resembles a fix or a solution... will keep looking here. Thanks |
|
 LeathalPremium
join:2002-02-09
M1S0G4
kudos:2 | reply to Oregonian
I hear that 2.0 is suppose to be a lot nicer than 1.1, a good friend of mine is writing this web base ohip billing program for some doctor in interbase. His programs loads up the clients, sorts them, etc etc.. in 842ms, .NET 1.1 does the same tasks on a HUGE database in about 4 or 5 seconds.
Ah well I am not programmer so I don't bother me with your jargin.
Leathal |
|
| I copied and pasted msvcr80.dll from the c:\WINDOWS\WinSxS folder to the c:\WINDOWS\System32 folder, and now Nortons doesn't show any errors and SO FAR no problems. Is this a good fix or should I have done it differently? |
|
