Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » BellSouth: Charge for Website Speed » And the Greedy get greedier,....
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

reply to Pake
Re: And the Greedy get greedier,....

Google pays for internet connectivity to someone, maybe it is actually BellSouth. I don't know, nor do I care. Point is that whoever it is that Google is paying for connectivity only needs to concern itself with providing the SLA and speed/bandwidth they are contracted by Google to provide. Now if Google comes to the above and says "Hey we want our traffic at a higher priority then any other traffic for companies that you are hosting" then that company is free to charge whatever Google is willing to pay to have their packets routed at a higher priority once it hits the hosting companies network. Provided of course that every other customer of that provider has already agreed (thru a EULA or whatever) to allow them to lower the priority of their packets. Because you can’t raise the priority of one packet without lowering the priority of every other packet.

No connectivity provider (backbone, ISP, Telco, Cable Co) has any right to interfere with any packet coming across the internet. Regardless of the number or the destination of such packets. They should remain transparent packet routers who's only concern should be with the SLA and speed/bandwidth they were contracted to provide. If they want to limit speed and amount of packets that one can send/receive so be it. Let ISP's and hosting companies create the packages for us to review and make an educated decision to buy or not to buy. And US would include user's as well as content providers like Google.

If BS is implying that they should be charging Google or any other company for packets directed to their servers from a BS client on the BS network, they are simply entering waters they have no business being in. They have absolutely no right to interfere with a user’s packet in any way as long as that user is within the scope of the speed/bandwidth that they have contracted for. If the user goes outside of that limit, then and only then does BS have a right to interfere with that specific user’s connection.
Forums » BellSouth: Charge for Website Speed


Wednesday, 09-Dec 16:22:35 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [93] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [58] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
Most people now reading
· MicroSoft Discontinues Sale of Windows 7 Family Pack in US [Microsoft Help]
· The aftermath [World of Warcraft]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· Smoke detectors gone wild [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [ Classes] ATTN Death Knights - Post your spec for critique! [World of Warcraft]
· Doesn't anyone salt walkways anymore? [Canadian Chat]
· Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.42.34 [Security]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· whole house ups [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Man Downloads Child Porn "Accidentally," Faces 20 Years [Security]