killernassir
join:2006-01-26
1 edit | reply to byebyebye
Re: [Extreme] alternative ports for 1720 (tested)
please help iam on rogers my download drop to 1-5k and port 1720 or 1755 doesn't work for me what other port are there please iam paying 40 for this shit |
|
loneguard
join:2005-07-15
Etobicoke, ON | reply to byebyebye
port 1755 on BitComet .61 with encryption enabled.
D/l'ing a 700 MB file @ 726 KB/s
Steady around 680 - 700 KB/s |
|
Death2U
Premium
join:2006-01-22
1 edit | reply to byebyebye
Some of you guys make it hard to guage the Rogers problem though I assume bad. You guys seem to confuse kbps and KB/sec alot. 1 KB/sec or kilobyte a sec=about 8 kbps or kilobits per second which every isp measures by to look good. RR's shaper in this area is weird sometimes no effect sometimes massive but seems to only function if I've been downloading/sharing for hours but then it adjusts ports fast. Mainly now the new models do this by packet headers and patterns, not port. 100 KB/sec is not horrible if you consider hosts are split often and don't have their pcs configured as long as you get higher sometimes. When RR finally responds, download with 20 seeds can be 3 KB/sec. This is Rogers forum so I will tell you how I bypassed this and see if Rogers customers benefit. A program called http tunnel, it requires some config work or the connection sometimes crashes. It encrypts connections to proxies that then unencrypt. Its top speeds aren't as good as what I get before filtering kicks in, but it sure does help after it does. Can go from 3-5 KB/sec to about 200 again, if you need config help, the e-mail button is in my profile. I don't want to hog this whole forum. Best client as far as working well with it is Bitcomet(has all the necessary options to adjust). Good luck guys. I hate ISP claiming a speed and then discriminating what services they deliver it on because of money ~.O |
|
kooba
join:2006-01-13
Beverly Hills, CA
2 edits | reply to byebyebye
{edited for content}
There really is no difference between Rogers and Bell in terms of torrent dl's.
IF ANYTHING Rogers is better (even though I'm sure they're just as an evil a company).
I HAD Hell Sympatico at my old man's house and it was decent at best for high speed dl's.
My Aunt has Rogers and it's phenomenal for dl times.
Although this 1720/1755 thing has yet to be tried.
BitComet was dropped twice this morning once during the early hours and again about an hour ago.
{edited for content} |
|
COOLangel
join:2004-04-05
Canada | reply to byebyebye
HELP!
1720 or 1755 is not working for me as of today!!
anyone have any other solutions??
thanks! |
|
sbrook
Premium,Mod
join:2001-12-14
H0H 0H0 | Try reasding some of the other threads on this matter. There aren't many other things to do except maybe seeing if changing your IP address might help. |
|
TKI
@cable.rogers | reply to byebyebye
Re: [Extreme] alternative ports for 1720 (tested)
any new ports to use? none of these work now, sigh. |
|
mjbad2
join:2004-08-27
HeHeHe
| reply to kooba
said by kooba  :{edited for content} I HAD Hell Sympatico at {edited for content} Nice one. |
|
IN4MER
join:2001-10-13
1 edit | reply to byebyebye
i've changed the ports to 80(http) and it seemed to IMPROVE the speeds from 5-10kb to 15-20kb and upping was up to 45kb(my max) last night. |
|
cgigate
join:2003-05-12
Fort Worth, TX | reply to byebyebye
I tried port 80, BitComet speed is still 0 |
|
theface07
@nf.net
| reply to byebyebye
I'm also getting 0KB/sec as of today with 1720 and 1755. This is strange because ever since I first noticed the port blocking I changed to 1720 and it has been working fine up until this point. Did rogers subsequently block ports 1720 and 1755 because they knew people were using them? |
|
sbrook
Premium,Mod
join:2001-12-14
H0H 0H0 | Probably ... a) because they will see heavy P2P traffic still, and b) because it's been advertised in here like there's no tomorrow, and Rogers people do read these forums. |
|
maloncanth
join:2006-02-04
| reply to byebyebye
I too am running into this new BT problem. I'd previously been cloaking under BitComet on port 1720 but this does not appear to work anymore as of sometime earlier this week. I was definitely able to download at full speed as late as Thursday (Feb 2, 2006) but my speeds have dropped drastically since then. No torrent is averaging over 5-10KB/s.
Has anyone found the nature of this new weapon by Rogers or determined how to defeat it? |
|
Talon88
The One
join:2003-08-13
Toronto
 ·Bell Sympatico
2 edits | reply to byebyebye
:::
I also fall into this less than 10k speed start
at Feb 02, 2006. Don't know what that stupid doing.
If Download speed is that slow, I will change to DSL.
Anyone have good DSL deal plese post....!
I think Rogers is only enough for or only for lite
web browsing & emailing only. I am doing Computer
business. Now, I only recomand customer DSL is
real hi-speed, Cable internet is slow speed & is not
for Download & multimedia. Beside of this, I also
educate my customer to read Rogers forum here, So
they can read the turth & prevent them to fall
into the Rogers slow-speed but high price network!
So, Please post Good DSL Deal, So I can recommand
to the customer & help them & ourself to avoid
cheating by Rogers Slow-Speed Internet.
:::
--
[=Talon88=]
»D-Link FW update "Talon88 Crash Recovery" Step by
--
»[Info] Some Clue about DI-624 Reboot
--
»DI-624 Firmware update w/ Crash Recovery Step by S (Old) |
|
mordin
42 inches of 1080p
Premium
join:2005-05-28
Moncton, NB
| said by Talon88 : I also educate my customer to read Rogers forum here, So they can read the turth & prevent them to fall into the Rogers slow-speed but high price network! Slow speeds are in locations where they are throttling Bittorrent and P2P. My downloads from Usenet & webpages are great. While you're at it, you better tell your customers to go read the Sympatico forum so they know about all the possible problems with DSL.
--
P4 2.8 800 fsb, Asus P4P800 MoBo w/1Gig PC3200 RAM, 256 Meg GeForce 5600, Sound Blaster Audigy Gamer, DVD-Rom/CD-R Burner & LG Duel layer DVD Burner, 2x 120 Gig Hard Drives |
|
nick_____
@cable.rogers
| reply to byebyebye
jhust installed azureus beta and set:
options -> connection -> advanced network settings -> require encrypted transport (plain, check allow non-encrypted... both of them)
if enough people do this.. pretty much rogers wouldn't be able to do anything about that.. |
|
chancet
join:2006-02-05
Schenectady, NY
| reply to byebyebye
stop debating this sh!t holy sweet flyin fack! switch ISPs already to DSL... and not them Bell d!cks! i've had 5 ISPs so take it from me. go with a small ISP like ontario dsl... phone them up... get 3meg dsl for 30 dollars a month and buy your own modem (they allow for that, unlike bell, which must include modem rental charge)... tell them on the phone you heard they provide the deal without a cap included to get rid of that sh!t, then you're good to go. if the situation has changed with them since, I would recommend just any smaller company... small being gauged by whether or not they have a facked automated voice piece of sh!t when u call tech support, and of course throttling and capping. |
|
chancet
join:2006-02-05
Schenectady, NY | sure there might be run arounds rogers crap, but go with a company that is conservative in such, so you stop wasting time thinking about it |
|
seed8
join:2003-09-23 | reply to byebyebye
the problem is all DSL ISPs use Bell's CO so if they can't get Bell, they can't get DSL. |
|
