Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Mr. Verizon, May We Build a Wi-Fi Network? » Wilkes Barre has more serious problems
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
231
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Monopolistic?  
AuthorAll Replies


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
 Wilkes Barre has more serious problems

Wilkes Barre doesn't need to ask Verizon's permission to remove all the drug-addicted bums and beggars from the street. Why don't they do that instead?
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!


enOehT
Premium
join:2003-05-17
Langhorne, PA

You are darn right Wilkes-Barre has more serious problems.

WiFi should not be on the top of their list of things to address.

I would be surprised if anyone would even use WiFi there. The literacy rate there is abysmal as is poverty and lack of education.


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA

reply to pnh102
said by pnh102 See Profile :

Wilkes Barre doesn't need to ask Verizon's permission to remove all the drug-addicted bums and beggars from the street. Why don't they do that instead?
If they want WiFi, they are just as entitled as a rich community. Have you thought that more ready access to technology and education might actually help them? Or is the only way to deal with beggars and drug users to lock them up (or torture them, you seem to like torture).


enOehT
Premium
join:2003-05-17
Langhorne, PA

said by vpoko See Profile :

education might actually help them?
Indeed education might help them. They need all the help they can get.


Dr Demento
I Vant Blud

join:2002-01-02
Denville, NJ

reply to pnh102
said by pnh102 See Profile :

Wilkes Barre doesn't need to ask Verizon's permission to remove all the drug-addicted bums and beggars from the street. Why don't they do that instead?
Getting rid of people sure has a nice ring to it, maybe he should focus funds on opening up more of the homeless shelters which I think he closed since somebody told me there has not been this many homeless on the streets for years. I bet, plenty of those people could want a job and would probably find plenty within public works as well.

Btw, its great to know that the same company that is forcing me and my roommates to fork over $40 a month, where did the $30 a month deal go, is going to supply the wireless. And it is probably going to be in the old section too so I won't be able to receive it from my apartment.


JTRockville
Data Ho
Premium,MVM
join:2002-01-28
Rockville, MD
clubs:
reply to pnh102
Are Wilkes Barre officials limited to only one action at a time, or is it possible they could do both (deal with drug-addicted bums and beggers AND build a Wi-Fi network)?


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

said by JTRockville See Profile :

Are Wilkes Barre officials limited to only one action at a time, or is it possible they could do both (deal with drug-addicted bums and beggers AND build a Wi-Fi network)?
They could but if you have a limited amount of cash, as most cities do, then it makes more sense to allocate that cash to solve the most critical problems first and then use what is left to deal with other issues.
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by JTRockville See Profile :

Are Wilkes Barre officials limited to only one action at a time, or is it possible they could do both (deal with drug-addicted bums and beggers AND build a Wi-Fi network)?
They could but if you have a limited amount of cash, as most cities do, then it makes more sense to allocate that cash to solve the most critical problems first and then use what is left to deal with other issues.
Ahh, the article is not clear on whether this would be paid for with tax dollars. If so, I have to agree with you there. if they want to expand internet access to poor communities the best way to do it would be through public libraries. Otherwise there are much more urgent ways to spend that money.


holocron
Premium
join:2004-06-28
Minneapolis, MN
·Qwest.net
·Vonage
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to JTRockville
said by JTRockville See Profile :

Are Wilkes Barre officials limited to only one action at a time, or is it possible they could do both (deal with drug-addicted bums and beggers AND build a Wi-Fi network)?
Depends on whos brother/nephew/uncle stands to benefit.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to enOehT
said by enOehT See Profile :

Indeed education might help them. They need all the help they can get.
See I'd be all for dumping the money they would spend on WiFi into the school system.
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to vpoko
said by vpoko See Profile :

If they want WiFi, they are just as entitled as a rich community. Have you thought that more ready access to technology and education might actually help them?
Philadelphia spent nearly $1 billion on new sports stadiums while they continue to have some of the worst schools in Pennsylvania and a disturbingly increasing crime rate. You would think they would be all for pouring more money into the school system (go drive down Broad Street and see how palatial the school system building is) or hiring more cops. Nah, they just want to waste their money on an unneeded toy network. Other "cash-strapped" cities in Penna. shouldn't be making this mistake.
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

If they want WiFi, they are just as entitled as a rich community. Have you thought that more ready access to technology and education might actually help them?
Philadelphia spent nearly $1 billion on new sports stadiums while they continue to have some of the worst schools in Pennsylvania and a disturbingly increasing crime rate. You would think they would be all for pouring more money into the school system (go drive down Broad Street and see how palatial the school system building is) or hiring more cops. Nah, they just want to waste their money on an unneeded toy network. Other "cash-strapped" cities in Penna. shouldn't be making this mistake.
Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
So you're saying that the city is spending taxpayer dollars to build this network? Do you have a reference or is this an intuition?


marigolds
Gainfully employed, finally
Premium,MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO

said by vpoko See Profile :

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
So you're saying that the city is spending taxpayer dollars to build this network? Do you have a reference or is this an intuition?
I thought you were saying that Earthlink was assuming the financial risk on the stadum.
The original post talked about the money spent on the stadium, not any money spent on Wireless Philadelphia.
--
ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet
telnet://whip.isca.uiowa.edu
Member: American Association of Geographers, American Geophysical Union, American Water Resources Association


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA

said by marigolds See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
So you're saying that the city is spending taxpayer dollars to build this network? Do you have a reference or is this an intuition?
I thought you were saying that Earthlink was assuming the financial risk on the stadum.
The original post talked about the money spent on the stadium, not any money spent on Wireless Philadelphia.
My bad! I know nothing of the stadium.


TheMadSwede
Premium
join:2001-01-30
Holland, MI
·Charter Pipeline

reply to pnh102
said by pnh102 See Profile :

Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
I don't disagree with you about people getting bought off; however, it's always best to provide proof of such.

For example, people in Chicago talk all the time about the current mayoral adminstration's "indiscretions" and yet the current administration has been in power since 1989. Granted there are current federal investigations going on; however, there's little value in saying there's corruption, but much value in proving it. (if you're from Chicago, spare me the flames - I dislike Daley just as much as the next guy).
--
home
Forums » Mr. Verizon, May We Build a Wi-Fi Network?« Monopolistic?  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 07:20:37 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [83] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [83] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [33] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [14] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [11] Monday Evening Links
· [9] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [6] AT&T Launching New 7.2 Mbps 3G Modem
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· How in the world am I going to get into college? [General Questions]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [ Classes] 3.2.2 Rogue [World of Warcraft]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Supercomputer! [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]