Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Mr. Verizon, May We Build a Wi-Fi Network? » Wilkes Barre has more serious problems
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Monopolistic?  
AuthorAll Replies


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

reply to vpoko
Re: Wilkes Barre has more serious problems

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA
·Comcast

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
So you're saying that the city is spending taxpayer dollars to build this network? Do you have a reference or is this an intuition?


marigolds
Gainfully employed, finally
Premium,MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO

said by vpoko See Profile :

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
So you're saying that the city is spending taxpayer dollars to build this network? Do you have a reference or is this an intuition?
I thought you were saying that Earthlink was assuming the financial risk on the stadum.
The original post talked about the money spent on the stadium, not any money spent on Wireless Philadelphia.
--
ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet
telnet://whip.isca.uiowa.edu
Member: American Association of Geographers, American Geophysical Union, American Water Resources Association


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA
·Comcast

said by marigolds See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
So you're saying that the city is spending taxpayer dollars to build this network? Do you have a reference or is this an intuition?
I thought you were saying that Earthlink was assuming the financial risk on the stadum.
The original post talked about the money spent on the stadium, not any money spent on Wireless Philadelphia.
My bad! I know nothing of the stadium.


TheMadSwede
Premium
join:2001-01-30
Holland, MI
·Charter Pipeline

reply to pnh102
said by pnh102 See Profile :

Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
I don't disagree with you about people getting bought off; however, it's always best to provide proof of such.

For example, people in Chicago talk all the time about the current mayoral adminstration's "indiscretions" and yet the current administration has been in power since 1989. Granted there are current federal investigations going on; however, there's little value in saying there's corruption, but much value in proving it. (if you're from Chicago, spare me the flames - I dislike Daley just as much as the next guy).
--
home
Forums » Mr. Verizon, May We Build a Wi-Fi Network?« Monopolistic?  


Wednesday, 15-Oct 15:50:20 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [131] All Hail the New RIAA Copyright Czar
· [77] More on Comcast's New 22Mbps Speed Tier
· [71] Comcast: Hey, At Least We're Not Hiking Broadband/VoIP Prices
· [54] New 'Economic Stimulus' Plan Includes Universal Broadband
· [38] 72% Of P2P Pirates Would Stop With ISP Warning
· [31] Google: We're Fresh Out Of Androids
· [30] AT&T To Sell U-Verse At Walmart, Circuit City
· [30] Crackberry Addicts Fear Microsoft Takeover
· [29] Unions Want Improper Cable Grounding Inspected, Too
· [27] Virgin: Our 50Mbps Tier Breaks Your Speed Tests
Most people now reading
· Extreme HD and Essentials [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [WotLK] What you guys think of the patch? [World of Warcraft]
· Southern California New HD Watch [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [WotLK] Broken (OP) Holy Paladin Build (Current Beta) [World of Warcraft]
· Sarah Palin Ordered to Preserve Yahoo! Emails [Security]
· [Need Info] Fastest Browser (Windows) [Software]
· [ Classes] Hunters in 3.0.2 (from BRK and WoWInsider.com) [World of Warcraft]
· Official Patch Notes - 3.0.2 [World of Warcraft]
· Adobe Flash Player 10 Released [Security]