Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Mr. Verizon, May We Build a Wi-Fi Network? » Wilkes Barre has more serious problems
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Monopolistic?  

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

Re: Wilkes Barre has more serious problems

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!

vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA

Re: Wilkes Barre has more serious problems

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
So you're saying that the city is spending taxpayer dollars to build this network? Do you have a reference or is this an intuition?

marigolds
Gainfully employed, finally
Premium,MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO

Re: Wilkes Barre has more serious problems

said by vpoko See Profile :

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
So you're saying that the city is spending taxpayer dollars to build this network? Do you have a reference or is this an intuition?
I thought you were saying that Earthlink was assuming the financial risk on the stadum.
The original post talked about the money spent on the stadium, not any money spent on Wireless Philadelphia.
--
ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet
telnet://whip.isca.uiowa.edu
Member: American Association of Geographers, American Geophysical Union, American Water Resources Association

vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA

Re: Wilkes Barre has more serious problems

said by marigolds See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

said by pnh102 See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

Philadelphia is not spending taxpayer money - they set up a non-profit and Earthlink is assuming the financial risk.
Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
So you're saying that the city is spending taxpayer dollars to build this network? Do you have a reference or is this an intuition?
I thought you were saying that Earthlink was assuming the financial risk on the stadum.
The original post talked about the money spent on the stadium, not any money spent on Wireless Philadelphia.
My bad! I know nothing of the stadium.

TheMadSwede
Premium
join:2001-01-30
Holland, MI
·Charter Pipeline

said by pnh102 See Profile :

Heh... you got a lot to learn about the way things get done in Philadelphia The only risk Earthlink is taking is that all the politicians they bought off don't end up in prison or jump to their deaths from atop the City Hall tower.
I don't disagree with you about people getting bought off; however, it's always best to provide proof of such.

For example, people in Chicago talk all the time about the current mayoral adminstration's "indiscretions" and yet the current administration has been in power since 1989. Granted there are current federal investigations going on; however, there's little value in saying there's corruption, but much value in proving it. (if you're from Chicago, spare me the flames - I dislike Daley just as much as the next guy).
--
home
Forums » Mr. Verizon, May We Build a Wi-Fi Network?« Monopolistic?  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 19:27:00 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [198] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [105] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [63] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [55] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· MicroSoft Discontinues Sale of Windows 7 Family Pack in US [Microsoft Help]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· Man Downloads Child Porn "Accidentally," Faces 20 Years [Security]
· TSN2 : Un rêve devenu réalité! [Videotron]
· whole house ups [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.42.34 [Security]
· Hot Girl falls face first down stairs [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· [ Classes] ATTN Death Knights - Post your spec for critique! [World of Warcraft]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]