said by ronpin 
:The appeals court went on to distinguish between a pledge and an assignment, then stated that the city ordinance fails to provide for a requirement of default before using residual revenues to repay the fiber bonds. That is prohibited, the court ruled.
Another violation of the Fair Competition Act occurs because the bond ordinance calls for five funds to handle money for the fiber project instead of a single fund as required by law, the appeal court ruled.
Seems like simply outsourcing to somebodies 'bro-law would fix it eh?
As long as that bro-in-law was a relative of a BS exec, then I'm sure it would be fine and dandy.
·
