republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Qwest Revamps Controversial User Agreement » Good work people
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
This sucks, IMO »
AuthorAll Replies

GigahertZ420

join:2001-10-02
Fairbanks, AK

reply to insomniac84
Re: Good work people

Yeah it sure would be terrible if a security expert such as yourself *somehow* got a 0 day exploit and was forced to pay... GULP... 14,000 spams * $5 = $70,000 !

I hope you were being sarcastic but if not, enjoy your fine - you security expert you!


insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN

I am no security expert. I think the main reason I am fine is because I don't click on links in instant messenger, install anything that popups in a web browser, use webmail clients that scan for viruses, and have an updated virus scanner running. Nothing out of the ordinary, or anything that anyone would consider expert.

NetDroid2

join:2004-08-16
Excelsior, MN

reply to GigahertZ420
hmm... if they would of kept the $5 per spam in there we would have FTTP by the end of the year!
(That is if there was a spam out break this year.)
Or at the very least a nice network upgrade.

Its nice they changed the wording if I ever decided to go to DSL.


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

reply to insomniac84
With the recent WMF Zero-Day exploit all you would have needed to have done is viewed a webpage that included an exploited WMF file on it. That could have gotten you infected which, in turn, could have turned your system into a spam-spewing zombie. I think warning letters followed by service cutoffs are a better solution. (So long as there is sufficient customer service available to contest wrongly applied warnings/cutoffs and to restore service to people who clean their systems.)
--
-Jason Levine
My Gallery | Jason's Toolbox | PCQandA.com | URateit.com

shashinka

join:2000-09-16
West Boylston, MA
reply to insomniac84
Well I guess you're impenetrable, untouchable, certainly because you think you're not an expert. You can never be too vigilant.


DreamWraith
Premium
join:2004-04-07
Mount Vernon, WA

reply to insomniac84
So what you are trying to say is:

You don't:

Click on links in IM.
Install anything in pop-ups.
Use web-mail clients with virus scan.
Have an updated virus scanner.

Next time you might want to keep an eye on your grammar.
:P


dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

reply to NetDroid2
said by NetDroid2 See Profile :

hmm... if they would of kept the $5 per spam in there we would have FTTP by the end of the year!
Nah, the CxO's will just get larger bonuses
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth


insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN


1 edit
reply to shashinka
said by shashinka See Profile :

Well I guess you're impenetrable, untouchable, certainly because you think you're not an expert. You can never be too vigilant.
Of course not impenetrable, but I would think everyone would agree that just using a small amount of intelligence while on the internet is all it takes to be fairly secure. Unfortunately for you, you probably have clicked every ok message you run across and loaded some nasty stuff on your computer, so it hurts you to hear people say that that only happened because you lacked basic intelligence.
I suggest you get a platform that's not worth hacking, like a mac.

shashinka

join:2000-09-16
West Boylston, MA

1 edit
reply to DreamWraith
No I am not saying that and thanks for being my grammar checker. Just because he doesn't do these things doesn't mean that he should not be worried about infections. Lets not be nieve.

shashinka

join:2000-09-16
West Boylston, MA

reply to insomniac84
You got me. Actually I do watch what I install, click-on, and read, etc. On top of that I evaluate all sorts of security suites: McAfee's free suite that comes with Comcast runs on several of my families machines, Zonealarm on dial-up with my father, Charter's free suite on 1 of my machines, and my Cisco work computer has Cisco Security Agent with another vendors AV.

On the other hand you said you're running nothing and are nieve to believe that just because you do what you do that you're safe and duh to the others who don't know so!

I constantly update family members to watch what they install and what they're doing but definitely need to make sure they have suites because they yes are too ignorant about the way things work, unlike myself since I am all day on the computer reading, implenting and testing these systems.
Forums » Qwest Revamps Controversial User AgreementThis sucks, IMO »


Tuesday, 01-Dec 10:33:55 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [62] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [53] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [38] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [30] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [22] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [21] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [9] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [9] Vivendi Agrees, Comcast/NBC Deal Soon
· [4] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· [Rant] called out sick! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· buying a one way ticket [General Questions]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· Outbound port 25 filtering. [TekSavvy]
· [OOL] Youtube not loading [OptimumOnline]