jpark
join:2005-02-05
Jackson, TN
| reply to vpoko
Re: Clarify this
said by vpoko  :said by tlniec :Exactly... if this 'clarification' isn't written into the ToS, it's meaningless. That's not true, look up "legal estopel". If somebody who you have a contract with makes a claim contrary to the contract (without modifying it) and then attempts to enforce the original terms of the contract, you can make an estopel defense. Sure. If you have the money to support legal action. Having a defence doesn't keep the TOS from threatening you. |
|
vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA
| reply to tlniec
said by tlniec :Exactly... if this 'clarification' isn't written into the ToS, it's meaningless. That's not true, look up "legal estopel". If somebody who you have a contract with makes a claim contrary to the contract (without modifying it) and then attempts to enforce the original terms of the contract, you can make an estopel defense. |
|
tlniec
join:2004-08-02
Cedar Rapids, IA | reply to packetscan
Exactly... if this 'clarification' isn't written into the ToS, it's meaningless. |
|
packetscan
Premium
join:2004-10-19
Bridgeport, CT
clubs:
 ·Optimum Online
| I don't care what you "mean" to say, Clarify all you want.
Put it in writing that this 5 dollar clause is not applicable to virus infections.
Because of there current TOS they can go after every single user!
--
Who do you want to pay off today? |
|
