Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Spam Tariff Sparks Debate » Spam-subsidized e-mail?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
3
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
The thing about AOL mail »
« I never get spam  
AuthorAll Replies


gwion
wild colonial boy
Premium,ExMod 2001-08
join:2000-12-28
Pittsburgh, PA

Spam-subsidized e-mail?

One of the problematic parts of this equation, to me, is that it "legitimizes" spam... that is, if you pay your "tariff", you get a "spam stamp", and it becomes, like a form of postage, a business - we want to sell spam stamps, to subsidize the overall mail service. It becomes harder to suggest a "zero tolerence" attitude. In other words, it amounts to complete, absolute, and barely conditional (pay your spam toll, we leave you alone) surrender.

It essentially makes your and my ISP complicit in the propagation of spam.

Shall we draw an analogy? Junk mail makes the Post Office millions. So many millions, that there are special mailing rates for "postal spam". The Post Office actively encourages and makes special accomodations for junk mail, because it's such a volume-intensive medium that it makes big money, in the aggregate. Is this a model we want borrowed and applied to e-mail? Do we want spammers subsidizing the e-mail system? That's something for consideration... because that's precisely what will eventually happen, on the slippery slope of this proposal...
--
Semper Eadem

In the middle of the journey of our life I came to myself in a dark wood where the straight way was lost...
Dante, Inferno, Canto I

jester121

join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
·surpasshosting
·ViaTalk

The shortcoming in your description is your definition of "spam". If it just means bulk mail, then your comments are mostly valid. However, if it means unsolicited bulk mail, which most people agree with, then it doesn't apply.

I don't have a problem with getting mailings from companies that I've done business with, as long as there's a way to opt out. Of course, this is a tiny fraction of the problem -- the real problem is the scum-spammers, the ones firing off millions of e-mails per day for Viagra, mortgages, porn, and other nonsense.

If nothing else, this system should make intelligent filtering much easier for ISPs.
Forums » Spam Tariff Sparks DebateThe thing about AOL mail »
« I never get spam  


Sunday, 08-Nov 23:18:45 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [93] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [83] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [77] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· [WIN7] Which Services in Win 7 Have You Turned Off? [Microsoft Help]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Rant] Brand New 'Jasper' Xbox360 - RRoD Hardware Failure [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Garbage Disposal and Dishwasher [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· Voxox Unlimited US/Canada for $2.45 or World $12.95 a month [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [FS] Motherboard + CPU + Hard Drive + Servers + More! [For Sale/Wanted]