republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Spam Tariff Sparks Debate » Spam-subsidized e-mail?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
7
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
The thing about AOL mail »
« I never get spam  
AuthorAll Replies

jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
·surpasshosting
·ViaTalk

reply to gwion
Re: Spam-subsidized e-mail?

The shortcoming in your description is your definition of "spam". If it just means bulk mail, then your comments are mostly valid. However, if it means unsolicited bulk mail, which most people agree with, then it doesn't apply.

I don't have a problem with getting mailings from companies that I've done business with, as long as there's a way to opt out. Of course, this is a tiny fraction of the problem -- the real problem is the scum-spammers, the ones firing off millions of e-mails per day for Viagra, mortgages, porn, and other nonsense.

If nothing else, this system should make intelligent filtering much easier for ISPs.


gwion
wild colonial boy
Premium,ExMod 2001-08
join:2000-12-28
Pittsburgh, PA

One of the problematic parts of this equation, to me, is that it "legitimizes" spam... that is, if you pay your "tariff", you get a "spam stamp", and it becomes, like a form of postage, a business - we want to sell spam stamps, to subsidize the overall mail service. It becomes harder to suggest a "zero tolerence" attitude. In other words, it amounts to complete, absolute, and barely conditional (pay your spam toll, we leave you alone) surrender.

It essentially makes your and my ISP complicit in the propagation of spam.

Shall we draw an analogy? Junk mail makes the Post Office millions. So many millions, that there are special mailing rates for "postal spam". The Post Office actively encourages and makes special accomodations for junk mail, because it's such a volume-intensive medium that it makes big money, in the aggregate. Is this a model we want borrowed and applied to e-mail? Do we want spammers subsidizing the e-mail system? That's something for consideration... because that's precisely what will eventually happen, on the slippery slope of this proposal...
--
Semper Eadem

In the middle of the journey of our life I came to myself in a dark wood where the straight way was lost...
Dante, Inferno, Canto I
Forums » Spam Tariff Sparks DebateThe thing about AOL mail »
« I never get spam  


Saturday, 05-Dec 09:35:07 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [94] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [84] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [79] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· Road Runnner up to 50 mbps is ready ! [Road Runner]
· Why do you switch distros? [All Things Unix]
· IPComms Free DIDs now with sip registration maybe?? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· DIR-655 1.31 Firmware available [D-Link]