Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Senate Hearing Tackles Network Neutrality » Hmmm...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Oh really? »
« let them try... i will stay with cable...  
AuthorAll Replies


GOLFnSUN
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


1 edit
 reply to oliphant
Re: Hmmm...

said by oliphant See Profile :

...if I blackmailed someone, I'd go to jail. If I bribed a Senator to vote my way...I'd go to jail. Telcos follow diff'rent rules than us lowly folk.
Don't worry, the providers are bribing other Senators to make sure their side has equal time in the committee discussions after the hearings. And you'll pay the price no matter which side wins, network neutrality won't change that fact.

Everybody screams "Network Neutrality" like it is some magic talisman that will guarantee them lower prices. Dream on!!
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
My Web Page
Conrail Photo Album

rileyjam514
There You Go Again...

join:2005-06-26
Kearny, NJ

I agree. Some Congressional Committee discussing "network neutrality" doesn't mean that it's going to happen.

Watch, the providers will gut the concept of neutrality to the point where it's useless.

And does anyone care? Nah, these are the phone companies. They can do anything.

Where's Eliot Spitzer when you (really) need him?
--
"It is my destiny to give back to the universe infinitely more than I have taken from it." -- Anonymous

AJ023

join:2001-12-25
Forest Hills, NY


1 edit
Spitzer actually will have an impact based on the NY State level especially as he appoints a new PSC when he wins.

So dont worry about Spitzer

I see you are in New Jersey however so it all depends on the NJ PSC or the equivalent thereof.

rileyjam514
There You Go Again...

join:2005-06-26
Kearny, NJ

Yeah, I'm in Jersey, with our wonderfully corrupt politics (former Newark resident) and impossible bureaucracy (NJ BPU = NY PSC only more corrupt since it's Jersey).

Granted, I'm not saying Spitzer's a saint or anything, but considering his anti-corporate record, I would think the phone companies and cable companies present a very large and tempting target to him, and I would hope that he takes them on and leads the charge (since Jersey will always follow suit - ha ha what a pun!!1!).

Only time will tell.
--
"It is my destiny to give back to the universe infinitely more than I have taken from it." -- Anonymous


asdjf

join:2005-01-01
·Cox HSI

Spitzer's much more anti-corrupt than anticorporate. That he happens to go after a lot of corporations says more about those corporations being corrupt than it does about Spitzer's stance on corporations.
--
144 145 145 172 040 156 165 164 163


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

said by asdjf See Profile :

Spitzer's much more anti-corrupt than anticorporate. That he happens to go after a lot of corporations says more about those corporations being corrupt than it does about Spitzer's stance on corporations.
If he only goes after Corporations that are corrupt or corrupting politics then I will have no problem with him as the Telcos and their dollars are definitely corrupting our political system.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)

Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

reply to GOLFnSUN
Do you even have a clue what net neutrality is about? Lower prices are not what's important here ya close minded puppet.

It's about making sure these monopolies (or duopolies)that you so blindly support dont use their market position to extort profits from legit businesses or restrict access to what should be free flowing packets throughout the entire internet.

Backbone providers should be doing nothing more than passing the packets they are paid to pass. They dont need to increase the priority of those that are giving in to their extortion and thus lowering the priority of those those that don't. And yes, they are paid for their services in full right now. There is no free ride as they would have you believe.
Forums » Senate Hearing Tackles Network NeutralityOh really? »
« let them try... i will stay with cable...  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 01:55:43 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [82] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [80] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [33] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [21] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [14] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [11] Monday Morning Links
· [9] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [5] AT&T Launching New 7.2 Mbps 3G Modem
Most people now reading
· Know when to run! [Home Repair & Improvement]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· How in the world am I going to get into college? [General Questions]
· Telus supports CRTC's NN and UBB [TekSavvy]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [WIN7] Which Services in Win 7 Have You Turned Off? [Microsoft Help]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· 60 Minutes piece on cyber security last night [Security]