N0_Nam3
join:2002-06-14
Leamington, ON | haha
which is why i have bell  |
|
BIGMIKE
Premium
join:2002-06-07
Westminster, CA
| Re: The End of the Internet?
The End of the Internet?
The nation's largest telephone and cable companies are crafting an alarming set of strategies that would transform the free, open and nondiscriminatory Internet of today to a privately run and branded service that would charge a fee for virtually everything we do online.
Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are developing strategies that would track and store information on our every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency. According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest pockets--corporations, special-interest groups and major advertisers--would get preferred treatment. Content from these providers would have first priority on our computer and television screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out.
Under the plans they are considering, all of us--from content providers to individual users--would pay more to surf online, stream videos or even send e-mail. Industry planners are mulling new subscription plans that would further limit the online experience, establishing "platinum," "gold" and "silver" levels of Internet access that would set limits on the number of downloads, media streams or even e-mail messages that could be sent or received. »The End of the Internet?
»www.thenation.com/doc/20060213/chester
--
Type "miserable failure" in Google |
|
Drex_CS
join:2005-05-11
canada | how's that tin foil working out for you? |
|
BIGMIKE
Premium
join:2002-06-07
Westminster, CA
| said by Drex_CS  :how's that tin foil working out for you? Not so good can you recommend a good Tin-foil hat?:D
--
Type "miserable failure" in Google |
|
rtcy
RTCY
Premium
join:1999-10-16
Norwalk, CA
 ·Verizon FIOS
| said by BIGMIKE :said by Drex_CS :how's that tin foil working out for you? Not so good can you recommend a good Tin-foil hat?:D the internet is becoming a replay of history during the late 1800's early 1900's now the new robber barons of today are the same hot air stock hype companies like Gooogle and the "reunited" phone companies that were once MA bell, of course let's not forget or greedy friend in the cable companies, that re-invented their own monpolistic ideas of "franchise" to price control what we all see.
all the authors of the p2p software dp is come up up with a random port scheme to get around this.
What pussles me in this commentary is the line that talks about of Rogers and Shaw "upgrading" their network. I was under the *gealous* impression for some time now that both of these Canadian Giants had *pure* fiber optics is this not true?
if it is true the why are they throtling speeds? i tought they had bragged about all the unlimited bandwidth they had, why not upgrade the hardware to the faster OC192, as I understand it, that is all that is basically needed to double or triple speeds, it's not like they would have to layout new fiberoptic cable all over again |
|
Dryvlyne
Far Beyond Driven
Premium
join:2004-08-30
Newark, OH
| reply to BIGMIKE
said by BIGMIKE :The End of the Internet? The nation's largest telephone and cable companies are crafting an alarming set of strategies that would transform the free, open and nondiscriminatory Internet of today to a privately run and branded service that would charge a fee for virtually everything we do online. Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are developing strategies that would track and store information on our every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency. According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest pockets--corporations, special-interest groups and major advertisers--would get preferred treatment. Content from these providers would have first priority on our computer and television screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out. Under the plans they are considering, all of us--from content providers to individual users--would pay more to surf online, stream videos or even send e-mail. Industry planners are mulling new subscription plans that would further limit the online experience, establishing "platinum," "gold" and "silver" levels of Internet access that would set limits on the number of downloads, media streams or even e-mail messages that could be sent or received. » The End of the Internet?» www.thenation.com/doc/20060213/chester Three words to sum this up - NEW WORLD ORDER
--
In relative terms life is shorter than the blink of an eye. Remember that each and every day because in the end it's not about what you've done but how you've lived.
|
|
Drex_CS
join:2005-05-11
canada | reply to rtcy
they have fiber backbones, so fiber to the node, but not into the house from what I understand. |
|
rtcy
RTCY
Premium
join:1999-10-16
Norwalk, CA
·Verizon FIOS
| said by Drex_CS :they have fiber backbones, so fiber to the node, but not into the house from what I understand. Sounds to me like they don't even have a legitimate reason to steal their clients bandwidth. I can see how some of these cable giants that now *need* more bandwidth to sell phone services are making shady decisions with their clients paid for bandwidth. |
|
