rileyjam514
There You Go Again...
join:2005-06-26
Kearny, NJ
| Good stuff, but...
"That said, it's highly unlikely that the current FCC would mandate the industry to switch models."
Let's not jump to conclusions here, shall we? It's very possible this report will have more weight than the previous one and that the FCC will act positively in this regard.
Yes, it may not happen but let's wait and see instead of whining about how it won't happen.
--
Abortion is murder, Reagan was a hero, Clinton was a sleazeball, Iraq is much better off without Saddam, and the telcos are not trustworthy with American tax dollars. There! I've managed to offend a significant portion of BBR! |
|
King P
Don't blame me. I voted for Ron Paul
Premium
join:2004-11-17
Inman, SC
 ·Windstream
 ·Charter Pipeline
·Speakeasy
 ·Vonage
| who'd a thunk it...
wow, I guess consumer choice is good after all...
although, this really could be a boon for the cableco's also. If the price is 1 dollar per channel, and there are 50 channels you want, then they are really making more money off of you than someone that gets the 13 dollar a month basic package (comcast).
--
Forget 'em, Support the Indies.»www.ind-music.com |
|
dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
| said by King P  :although, this really could be a boon for the cableco's also. If the price is 1 dollar per channel, and there are 50 channels you want, then they are really making more money off of you than someone that gets the 13 dollar a month basic package (comcast). LOL! you mean there are 13 good channels on cable(other than HBO, starz, skinemax and showtime)?
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth |
|
Eric Martin
join:2005-06-19
66308 | Indecency Groups = Religous Groups
Just wait until this happens and then they start trying to ban the other channels they don't like.
You can't win if there are 'Censorship nazis' that want to control TV.
Is this the USA or China ? |
|
