macken 657
join:2006-01-29
Ballwin, MO
| reply to cool_coda
Re: Speeds
deployment has a lot to do with a state's franchise agreements, for instance, Texas eliminated the need for T to get agreements from each city, now only has to set agreements at the state level. 2 things happened as a result, T has greatly increased their IP deployment and Charter CATV has announced lower prices |
|
Zorglub
join:2000-11-18
Fremont, CA
| reply to Folic
said by Folic  :6MB/s max with IPTV, but they are expected to diliver upto 25MB/s for users without the IPTV service, but wont believe it till i see it. Wow, makes me want to get fiber only and keep Directv for my TVs... Maybe somebody can explain me why I should be excited about IP TV. It seems to me that we're trying to solve a technical problem that does not exist. That 19 MBps is not enough to supply 4 video feeds if 2 or 3 of them will be HD, so what's the point? |
|
pepperxn
join:2001-02-21 | reply to cool_coda
SBC bought out AT&T, and took the AT&T name, and changed the logo. Think of it as SBC with the AT&T name and logo. |
|
cool_coda
join:2004-09-08
Brownsburg, IN
| reply to Folic
Now that AT&T bought out SBC I am very interested in the developments of the project moving forward. But being around these parts (DSLunderground) they have been promising stuff for years.
So, I will sit patiently with the wait and see attitude. |
|
Folic
join:2004-10-03
Milwaukee, WI | 6MB/s max with IPTV, but they are expected to diliver upto 25MB/s for users without the IPTV service, but wont believe it till i see it. |
|
