Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Playing Both Sides in Two-Tier Debate » I Call Bull$#!+
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« It's clearly against equal opportunity  
Shark_615

join:2006-01-17
Pickering, ON

Re: letter to the editor...

The gas station doesn't but the Police will charge if you speed... So how does that analogy synch with what you are trying to prove?

Are you saying we should have internet cops to stop people from going over the predetermined bandwidth limit?

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Re: letter to the editor...

These analogies are all flawed.

While ISPs have generally priced by bandwidth alone, resulting in "all you can shovel" usage, their costs do vary somewhat by usage.

Shared facilities (particularly major connections to Internet backbone networks) are maintained at a level lower than what would be necessary for 100% "full-blown" usage. Vastly increased usage, whether it's caused by file-sharing, VoIP, or gaming, does carry the likelihood of increased costs to the ISPs, even if bandwidth offerings to particular end-users aren't broadened.

These increased costs have to be passed along somewhere. I'd just rather see it happen directly, where I (and other end users) get to choose what gets prioritized and what I don't care about, than indirectly, where those choices are made under the table by ISPs and content providers in a back room.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!

asdfdfdf

@xtraport.net

Re: letter to the editor...

I agree. If the usage patterns of certain users are actually undermining their model, they should just impose a neutral transfer cap to control the extreme use while not imposing on the average user. Then the user can prioritize their own use as they see fit.

This article again betrays that this isn't really about QOS offerings at all. What does bittorrent traffic have to do with QOS. Bittorrent use doesn't need anything beyond best effort. It isn't real time streaming or an application for which QOS makes sense. What the article writer really means is that he wants a service reduction for heavy users.
Forums » Playing Both Sides in Two-Tier Debate« It's clearly against equal opportunity  


Friday, 04-Dec 05:18:38 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [141] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [103] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [85] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [66] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [60] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management - All discussion here [Comcast HSI]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· [Wired] SRW208 - Hard Reset / Factory Defaults - (Lost Password) [Linksys]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· Road Runnner up to 50 mbps is ready ! [Road Runner]
· [ Classes] 3.2.2 Rogue [World of Warcraft]
· Microsoft actively urges IE 6 users to upgrade [Security]