Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Things you don't want Google to find...
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
2700
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Security Software Updates 18 February 2006 »
« OSX.Inqtana.A detected on Symantec.com  
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


SnowyOne
Premium
join:2003-04-05
Kailua, HI
·RoadRunner Cable
·Clearwire Wireless

reply to novaflare
Re: Things you don't want Google to find...

said by novaflare See Profile :

Again its not googles jobs to protect inept admins and users of such things it is the admins and users jobs to protect their data.
--
That's true of the data that Google indexes & serves via it's search engine because it's data that already is/was available for public viewing (that's how Google got it in the first place), but this is a different animal altogether & has nothing to do with Google as we now know it. Despite any waivers in the TOS to the contrary, it will be Googles job to safeguard the servers as well as the data on them.
I'd agree that any admin transferring anything sensitive in this manner would be labelled "inept"

OZO
Premium
join:2003-01-17
reply to antdude
Don't blame the messenger...


jbob
Reach Out and Touch Someone
Premium
join:2004-04-26
Little Rock, AR
·Comcast
·AT&T Southwest

reply to antdude
I'm not sure how anyone else feels but if Google was serving any personal/private data of mine, no matter how they got it, I think I might get me a lawyer and see about getting my personal/private data removed. Just because some inept admin allowed private data to be exposed for Google to cache doesn't make it alright for them to again open it for others to see. Now there might be some disagreements on what constitutes personal or private data however I would think things like salaries would be considered non grata by most. What would happen if Google cached some accidently exposed credit card info? Would they then wipe that data from their database or even be required to?

OZO
Premium
join:2003-01-17

said by jbob See Profile :

What would happen if Google cached some accidently exposed credit card info? Would they then wipe that data from their database or even be required to?
The answer would be simple - change that CC and sue those who have published your personal info.
What was published - remains so...
--
Keep it simple, it'll become complex by itself...


TerryMiller
Premium
join:2003-10-23

reply to jbob
said by jbob See Profile :

I'm not sure how anyone else feels but if Google was serving any personal/private data of mine, no matter how they got it, I think I might get me a lawyer and see about getting my personal/private data removed.
You'd have to go to the institution that exposed it first or it'd just get rediscovered. Don't forget the remaining search engines as well.

said by jbob See Profile :

Just because some inept admin allowed private data to be exposed for Google to cache doesn't make it alright for them to again open it for others to see.
If you asked them to remove it after the original data was removed and they refused then I'd agree with you.

said by jbob See Profile :

What would happen if Google cached some accidently exposed credit card info? Would they then wipe that data from their database or even be required to?
As stated earlier they didn't expose it. They just made it easier to find. You can build your own web crawler, there are even toolkits to do so. It's just easier and more efficient to use theirs.


bcool
Premium
join:2000-08-25
The Ozarks


1 edit
reply to zetan
said by zetan See Profile :

Then complain if someone comes along and pops one in.

ouch. I didn't see that metaphor coming...

To those who don't think so:
I think Google Desktop is a good idea. Perhaps its implementation needs a little retooling, I don't know. But it's silly to say that GDS is a bad idea. It can be a very useful tool.
--
"in flagrante delicto"


Khaine

join:2003-03-03
Australia
reply to antdude
Maybe it is time that we require a licence before you can use a computer

*sigh*
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecuritySecurity Software Updates 18 February 2006 »
« OSX.Inqtana.A detected on Symantec.com  
page: 1 · 2


Friday, 04-Dec 01:49:02 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [140] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [99] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [83] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [65] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [58] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for ToC/ToGC (3.x) [World of Warcraft]
· Help tracing cables [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [Business] how to bridge a smc 8014 business class modem [Comcast HSI]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· [video] Electrical Wire Tears Apart Tree [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· Usenet Services- Clarification [TekSavvy]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· [ Classes] Warlock Thread [World of Warcraft]