Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » In-Flight Wireless Use Dangerous? » Total Crap
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Let the technical assessment win out here »
« Re: Intentional and unintentional radiators  
AuthorAll Replies

shashinka

join:2000-09-16
West Boylston, MA
reply to Transmaster
Re: Total Crap

Also there is a limit on how much power they can transmit.

shashinka

join:2000-09-16
West Boylston, MA

reply to vpoko
Yeah it would have to be a lot of power with a highly directional antenna, that is tracking at 600 mph. They would also have to cover certain frequencies. They could go manual then to avoid a crash. I don't think it would affect GPS mounted on the top of the plane or even a compass, altimeter, etc. Good luck with that.


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA

reply to Transmaster
said by Transmaster See Profile :

Absolutely correct I know ham radio operators that bounce signals off of high flying jet aircraft undersides increasing the range of a 2 meter, and 440 mhz transmission by many hundreds of miles. This has been going on for decades and no harm has ever been done.
And don't forget some Hams have been doing moonbounce for decades, and there's no sign of the moon crashing


Transmaster
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus

join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY
·Qwest.net


1 edit
reply to vpoko
said by vpoko See Profile :

said by Transmaster See Profile :

Here we go again, if the avionics are this sensitive then it isn't safe to fly.
Common sense says true enough. If a 3 watt transmitter in your cellphone is a danger to avionics, then couldn't someone remotely crash a plane by pointing a big transmitting antenna at it?
Absolutely correct I know ham radio operators that bounce signals off of high flying jet aircraft undersides increasing the range of a 2 meter, and 440 mhz transmission by many hundreds of miles. This has been going on for decades and no harm has ever been done.
--
Low voltage Tech's are wimps, Real tech's use 45 pound filament transformers, plate voltages no less then 2400 volts with at least 10 amp's lighting 8877 triodes...BPL I'm coming to get you.


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA

reply to Transmaster
said by Transmaster See Profile :

Here we go again, if the avionics are this sensitive then it isn't safe to fly.
Common sense says true enough. If a 3 watt transmitter in your cellphone is a danger to avionics, then couldn't someone remotely crash a plane by pointing a big transmitting antenna at it?
Forums » In-Flight Wireless Use Dangerous?Let the technical assessment win out here »
« Re: Intentional and unintentional radiators  


Friday, 04-Dec 12:13:58 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [144] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [111] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [96] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [72] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [71] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Seasoning Cast Iron Cookware [General Questions]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [WotLK] Doing away w/ conquest? [World of Warcraft]
· A little freaky, not sure if its legit. [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Equal speeds ruling [Canadian Broadband]
· Is Usenet targettable under ACTA? [TekSavvy]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]