Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » In-Flight Wireless Use Dangerous? » Thats . . . Hogwash
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« It seems to me...  
AuthorAll Replies


GOLFnSUN
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to newyorkslick
Re: Thats . . . Hogwash

The IEEE is not some fly by night organization that was bought by the airlines trying to stop cell phones to make money. And the Carnegie Mellon engineers, if they say it may increase problems for cockpit systems, then it probably does.

All the "it isn't true" comments will be just carping because people don't want to give up anything they want - facts be damned.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
Conrail Photo Album


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

I'll wait for the study details.

CM claims that the risk is "higher than previously believed", a phrase that is, like the press release containing it, amazingly devoid of all specificity.

It could signify a huge risk, or it could mean that the risk has increased from one half second of GPS interference in every 3.6 million flights to one half second of GPS interference in every 3.58 million flights. Without more, little can be discerned.

CM's own press release states that between one and four cellphone calls are (illegally) made from most flights in the northeast US now, but doesn't call for increased enforcement of current laws--which, if there were an immediate threat to human life, it surely would.

CM is engaging in publicity hype. Whether or not there is anything behind the hype won't be known until the study is released.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!


cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

reply to GOLFnSUN
At the time, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann at the University of Utah were respected scientists as well, not people at some fly by night organization either. There little discovery turned out to be incorrect as well.

I'm not saying that the research is flaw. Just pointing out that even if a person is respected in their field, they aren't always correct.
--
"What gives them the right to come in and do this?" she said. - Lady complaining that she was getting FIOS in her backyard.
Forums » In-Flight Wireless Use Dangerous?« It seems to me...  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 09:51:06 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [89] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [84] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [33] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [22] Moto Sold About 100,000 Droids
· [16] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [12] Monday Evening Links
· [10] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [6] AT&T Launching New 7.2 Mbps 3G Modem
· [3] Sprint Announces Job Cuts
Most people now reading
· 60 Minutes piece on cyber security last night [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Wood floor opinion... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· You Asked for it! BoA X-Faction Items! [World of Warcraft]
· How in the world am I going to get into college? [General Questions]
· A fishy CRTC tarriff filed by bell? [TekSavvy]
· Blown out Ballasts [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Your ideal heroic 5-man class comp! [World of Warcraft]
· High latency when using VOIP [Wireless Service Providers]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]