Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » In-Flight Wireless Use Dangerous? » Thats . . . Hogwash
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« It seems to me...  

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: Thats . . . Hogwash

The IEEE is not some fly by night organization that was bought by the airlines trying to stop cell phones to make money. And the Carnegie Mellon engineers, if they say it may increase problems for cockpit systems, then it probably does.

All the "it isn't true" comments will be just carping because people don't want to give up anything they want - facts be damned.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
Conrail Photo Album

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Re: Thats . . . Hogwash

I'll wait for the study details.

CM claims that the risk is "higher than previously believed", a phrase that is, like the press release containing it, amazingly devoid of all specificity.

It could signify a huge risk, or it could mean that the risk has increased from one half second of GPS interference in every 3.6 million flights to one half second of GPS interference in every 3.58 million flights. Without more, little can be discerned.

CM's own press release states that between one and four cellphone calls are (illegally) made from most flights in the northeast US now, but doesn't call for increased enforcement of current laws--which, if there were an immediate threat to human life, it surely would.

CM is engaging in publicity hype. Whether or not there is anything behind the hype won't be known until the study is released.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

At the time, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann at the University of Utah were respected scientists as well, not people at some fly by night organization either. There little discovery turned out to be incorrect as well.

I'm not saying that the research is flaw. Just pointing out that even if a person is respected in their field, they aren't always correct.
--
"What gives them the right to come in and do this?" she said. - Lady complaining that she was getting FIOS in her backyard.
Forums » In-Flight Wireless Use Dangerous?« It seems to me...  


Thursday, 10-Dec 09:05:55 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [122] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [68] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [66] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [45] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Snow on Roof [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Forwarding previous owner's mail [Home Repair & Improvement]
· SB6120 Firmware update [Comcast HSI]
· [game] CG6 - Gunslinger - Day 1 [Pub Games]
· Hot Girl falls face first down stairs [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]