amungus
Premium
join:2004-11-26
America
clubs:
| how 'bout that...
that's funny stuff... all of 1/2 an hour, ha. Still, that's better than the 10 minutes or so that they say a windows box is automatically compromised with spyware/virus' etc...
I would also say that osx is still a little better off security wise because of how it's set up initially. |
|
Shark_615
join:2006-01-17
Pickering, ON | Who says what?
All of those studies are done on a Windows XP SP1 or less machine.
Considering the advances in said OS those studies are a moot point. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| reply to amungus
said by amungus  :that's funny stuff... all of 1/2 an hour, ha. Still, that's better than the 10 minutes or so that they say a windows box is automatically compromised with spyware/virus' etc... Putting out the challenge was pretty funny. It almost guarantees a successful attack will be launched. Anonymity is one of the best ways to maintain security. Begging to be hacked is one of the worst. As MAC systems become more widespread, the chance of widespread attacks grows.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page |
|
rgillis70
Premium
join:2002-12-30
Herndon, VA
| reply to amungus
Actually - there was a NAT challenge in the Security forum - the last step of which was to take a SP2 Windows box and stick it online. It was not hacked.
Proof is in the pudding - with the SP2 firewall on - the machine fared just as well as sitting behind a router. |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to amungus
Giving you the specious "10 minute" figure, that would be with thousands of script kiddies and other malevolent types banging away at it. This was one guy, who did it in a documented 30.
If the Mac folks continue to bury their heads in the sand it's going to bite them in the ass, hard.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
| reply to amungus
yea ive allways wondered about some of these time figures, i mean i for years didnt know much about securing my OS and never had an issue. i also never gave anyone a reason to snoop at my IP and i avoid questionable sites. course nowdays im a patch-a-holic.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
Hall
Premium,MVM
join:2000-04-28
Dayton, OH
·EarthLink
·AT&T Midwest
·Earthlink Cable Mo..
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail : Putting out the challenge was pretty funny. It almost guarantees a successful attack will be launched. Not true. A few years ago, before Apple switched to using a BSD-based system, there was a "hack the mac" competition that ran for a long time and was never hacked into. There was a decent cash reward for the victor too. |
|
guhuna
R.I.P Mike
Premium
join:2001-03-31
Brentwood, CA
·Covad Communications
·SONIC.NET
 ·PAXIO
| reply to RadioDoc
said by RadioDoc :Giving you the specious "10 minute" figure, that would be with thousands of script kiddies and other malevolent types banging away at it. This was one guy, who did it in a documented 30. If the Mac folks continue to bury their heads in the sand it's going to bite them in the ass, hard. Its still going to be either Bush's fault or Microsoft's fault in the end.
Always happens 
--
My new friend!Buy Danish! |
|
antwanp
Beyond FM, Beyond AM, XM Satellite Radio
Premium
join:2002-05-14
Cedar Hill, TX
clubs:
·T-Mobile US
·RoadRunner Cable
1 edit | reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :...As MAC systems become more widespread, the chance of widespread attacks grows. It's actually "Mac" not "MAC". MAC refers to Media Access Control. Two completely different things.
-Antwan L. |
|
raythompsontn
join:2001-01-11
Oliver Springs, TN
| reply to Hall
said by Hall :said by TKJunkMail : Putting out the challenge was pretty funny. It almost guarantees a successful attack will be launched. Not true. A few years ago, before Apple switched to using a BSD-based system, there was a "hack the mac" competition that ran for a long time and was never hacked into. There was a decent cash reward for the victor too. Who ran the contest? Apple? If Apple ran the contest and their product was found to be flawed would they announce it? Nope. They just got free security testing. And no one is the wiser. |
|
sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
·Optimum Online
| reply to Hall
said by Hall :said by TKJunkMail : Putting out the challenge was pretty funny. It almost guarantees a successful attack will be launched. Not true. A few years ago, before Apple switched to using a BSD-based system, there was a "hack the mac" competition that ran for a long time and was never hacked into. There was a decent cash reward for the victor too. Of course they were probably smart enough to not have ssh enabled, open to any IP and using password auth. This could be a "Linux Hack" contest. Pretty much any unix where you leave the front door open like that will be owned.
--
Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity |
|
Insder
There never was a second I in my name
Premium
join:2005-04-27
Salem, MA
| reply to guhuna
I blame the Republicans. Raising taxes caused this, somehow. That or Microsoft's Monopoly. Either way, Macs are unhackable.
[/end sarcastic politics!]
--
The one, the only, the Insder. :: Verizon Online DSL (2793/719) and Deer Alpha Firefox! |
|
gogeta6
join:2002-06-20
San Diego, CA
clubs: | reply to antwanp
Why does someone always have to say this? People were not confused between the two above. Sheesh. |
|
