Re: crooks - dslreports.com

shashinka join:2000-09-16 West Boylston, MA	reply to DaveNJ Re: crooks Cisco themselves recommend 70%. I myself having worked for and managed a Network Operations Center for a phone company that provided internet access. Our network usually ran during the day between 30-40% capacity. Maybe even higher at points, during this time our response times were still in check for streaming voice and video. I agree with G_Poobah on this. QOS is only needed during the peak times to assign bandwidth priority to the stream. On some even basic network setups no QOS is setup for voice calls and customers are told that everything will be fine unless there is a broadcast storm or some kind of traffic that is affecting the ports associated with the VOIP traffic. Such as an ip multicast for ghosting.
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-03-07 15:19:49 ·
DaveNJ No Fear join:1999-09-01 New Jersey ·Comcast ·Patriot Media	reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail : said by G_Poobah : Lie #1 : Real-Time packets need QOS and can't be delayed : OUTRIGHT LIE. Read about how internet 2 solved this issue. It was a technical issue, and the solution was NOT QOS, it was upgrading the network. OUTRIGHT TRUTH: Only in fantasy land will a network exist that can't reach 100% at some point in time. Join the real world. If a network is running at 40% people will feel it, a network at 100% is likely the same a highway at 100% nothing is going to happen. 40% is usually the limit before upgrades are needed.
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-03-07 14:58:26 ·


Friday, 04-Dec 15:08:12	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF