Transmaster
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus
join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY
 ·Qwest.net
| reply to CableTool
Re: Nutjobs
What a bunch of total horse shia't. We have been living in a world of RF fields all of our lives. You have Hamradio operators who have been soaked in such EMF for nearly a 100 years, except for problems with RF induced fevers in the late 1920's there has been no problems. The only documented problem I am aware of with RF fields in the frequencies used by the devices mentioned here is USN sailors who worked on ship board radars in the 50's and 60's developing cataracts years after the fact this because the equipment of the time was not shielded that well and the power levels where thousands of time higher.
--
Low voltage Tech's are wimps, Real tech's use 45 pound filament transformers, plate voltages no less then 2400 volts with at least 10 amp's lighting 8877 triodes...BPL I'm coming to get you. |
|
Freezone
join:2000-09-29
Southfield, MI | Have you noticed that cancer seems to be on the rise since the late 1920's? I know I would never live near any high powered electrical lines. |
|
JoeyDee
Premium
join:2004-07-23
Las Vegas, NV | Nutjob,
Cancer is more prevalent now because they used to die of old age before they had time to get cancer....
 |
|
RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission
| reply to Transmaster
said by Transmaster  :What a bunch of total horse shia't. We have been living in a world of RF fields all of our lives. You have Hamradio operators who have been soaked in such EMF for nearly a 100 years, And early pioneers in Ham radio have had health issues arise just like the military you mention, which is why there is a standard for Maximum Permissible Exposure today and Hams have to acknowledge that they meet MPE limits at their operating site when they renew licenses. Many countries also have a version of MPE requirements. Heck, even the evil commies in the old USSR had one, on paper anyway. And in our RF lab we have shielding and rules to limit human exposure to RF because of empirical proof of RF damage. I have had several co-workers over the years diagnosed with tumours that were thought (not proven) to have come from RF exposure due to the location of the tumours and the normal environment they worked in.
Now as to the affect that many Wi-Fi emitters will have, that is still an unknown, but like the Ham Radio operators of the early 1900's we will find out one way or another.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time. |
|
Jamuka
join:2005-06-06 | reply to Freezone
Maybe because we are better at detecting it. You think? |
|
