republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » 2006 Windows firewall 'Leak test' » FIRST POST
Uniqs:
200
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Jetico???  

LiberalKing
Intocable
Premium
join:2005-09-12
Bronx, NY

FIRST POST


BloodRoses
Gods lend wings to tainted hearts
Premium
join:2003-03-17
clubs:

Re: FIRST POST

SECOND POST

I WIN


--
- Stephie

Phylop
Premium
join:2002-11-17
Reston, VA

Re: FIRST POST

Isn't there a rule against "first post" posts?

Kompressor
Premium
join:2002-02-12
Huntington Beach, CA

Re: FIRST POST

Yes, there is.
The rule is, smart people aren't allowed to do it.

Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA

said by LiberalKing See Profile :

First moron, more like it.
said by the article :

it was not really designed to stop programs from getting out (phoning home)
Is "was in no way designed for" different from "was not really designed for" ? I think the latter suggests a minor effort which expects to fail, while the former suggests that the issue was not addressed in any way.

The XP/SP2 firewall is strictly inbound - by design - and though one can make a fair case for a firewall in both directions, hinting that XP/SP2 doesn't do such a good job on the outbound side is really disingenuous.

Steve
--
Stephen J. Friedl • Unix Wizard • Microsoft Security MVP • Tustin, California USA • my web site

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: FIRST POST

said by Steve See Profile :

The XP/SP2 firewall is strictly inbound - by design - and though one can make a fair case for a firewall in both directions, hinting that XP/SP2 doesn't do such a good job on the outbound side is really disingenuous.
I've read that the firewall that comes with Windows Vista will be a true 2 way firewall. The existing firewall vendors are already probably having their lawyers draw up anti-trust charges against Microsoft.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page
Done_Posting
Shoot to kill
Premium
join:2003-08-22
Toledo, OH

Re: FIRST POST

I've also read that the two-way firewall is supposed to make an appearance in XP/SP3 when it's realeased later this year.

- Tate
--
"I may work for a cable ISP, but I'm still an okay guy."

kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US

Correct, MS actually posted the details months ago: »www.microsoft.com/technet/commun···106.mspx

Moreover it's been already in Vista betas for a while now (since CTP Dec) but it wasn't that easy to activate: »www.networkworld.com/news/2006/0···all.html

I've received the latest beta (CTP Feb) from MSDN weeks ago but I haven't had a chance yet to look whether it's got better or not...

BillRoland
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Ocala, FL
clubs:
·Cox HSI

said by Steve See Profile :

said by LiberalKing See Profile :

First moron, more like it.
said by the article :

it was not really designed to stop programs from getting out (phoning home)
Is "was in no way designed for" different from "was not really designed for" ? I think the latter suggests a minor effort which expects to fail, while the former suggests that the issue was not addressed in any way.

The XP/SP2 firewall is strictly inbound - by design - and though one can make a fair case for a firewall in both directions, hinting that XP/SP2 doesn't do such a good job on the outbound side is really disingenuous.

Steve
Amen Steve See Profile. I'd really like to know why an inbound only firewall failing an outboung firewall test, is news?
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."

micl
Visit Lovely Downtown Port Starboard
Premium
join:2001-10-25
Silver Spring, MD

I remember when a firewall meant it blocked in-bound *and* outbound. If it just blocks in-bound, is it really a firewall just because someone calls it a firewall? Or is it just NAT?
--
If I don't see you in the future, I'll see you in the pasture

Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA

Re: FIRST POST

said by micl See Profile :

I remember when a firewall meant it blocked in-bound *and* outbound.
That's never been the definition: a firewall is a device which applies access policy to network traffic, and the administrator can define it in any direction as he wishes.

In 1994 I was setting up Livingston Portmaster routers with fairly extensive filtering rules, and just because I chose to employ no outbound protection doesn't mean that it wasn't a firewall.

And the XP firewall isn't do NAT anyway.

Steve
--
Stephen J. Friedl • Unix Wizard • Microsoft Security MVP • Tustin, California USA • my web site

AnonName

@kaballero.com

Re: FIRST POST

Ah, the Portmaster... I remember them well. I managed a few of them.

Great device, I liked it better than the Cisco 52xx and 53xx RAS servers but a hundred and twenty modems is just a mess of wires and cables.

Ever work with a DiGi board? I still have a couple of those around

-m-


The complements were intended not snide. I'm looking to bury the hatchet, not sharpen it.

JoeOnSunset
Doublethink Is Doubleplus Ungood.
Premium
join:2002-11-25
Ormond Beach, FL

This makes me want to bang my head on a table. Why is it news that software not designed to do something, lo and behold, doesn't do that thing? Arrrg! Here's a newsflash: I designed a great new test suite and found out that my television fails miserably at recording to DVDs. It wasn't really designed to be a DVD recorder, you see.

fireflier
Coffee. . .Need Coffee
Premium
join:2001-05-25
Limbo

Re: FIRST POST

LOL. I have a toaster oven that keeps shocking the crap out of me when I try to make margaritas with it. Why won't my TOASTER OVEN make margaritas???

Next. . .
--
I'd kill for a Nobel peace prize!
Forums » 2006 Windows firewall 'Leak test'« Jetico???  


Sunday, 29-Nov 19:44:02 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [80] Weekend Open Thread
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Surfers beware !!! [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Adding a subpanel - Recommendations? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [NFL] Week 12 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· stopthetvtax [Canadian Chat]
· post your uber speeds [TekSavvy]