 LiberalKing Intocable Premium join:2005-09-12 Bronx, NY | FIRST POST  | |
|
  BloodRoses Gods lend wings to tainted hearts Premium join:2003-03-17 clubs: | Re: FIRST POST SECOND POST
I WIN
 -- - Stephie | |
|
 |   Phylop Premium join:2002-11-17 Reston, VA | Re: FIRST POST Isn't there a rule against "first post" posts? | |
|
 |  |   Kompressor Premium join:2002-02-12 Huntington Beach, CA | Re: FIRST POST Yes, there is. The rule is, smart people aren't allowed to do it.  | |
|
  Steve I'm a PC, so shut up Consultant join:2001-03-10 Yorba Linda, CA
| said by LiberalKing : First moron, more like it.said by the article :
it was not really designed to stop programs from getting out (phoning home) Is "was in no way designed for" different from "was not really designed for" ? I think the latter suggests a minor effort which expects to fail, while the former suggests that the issue was not addressed in any way.
The XP/SP2 firewall is strictly inbound - by design - and though one can make a fair case for a firewall in both directions, hinting that XP/SP2 doesn't do such a good job on the outbound side is really disingenuous.
Steve -- Stephen J. Friedl Unix Wizard Microsoft Security MVP Tustin, California USA my web site | |
|
 |   TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| Re: FIRST POST said by Steve :The XP/SP2 firewall is strictly inbound - by design - and though one can make a fair case for a firewall in both directions, hinting that XP/SP2 doesn't do such a good job on the outbound side is really disingenuous. I've read that the firewall that comes with Windows Vista will be a true 2 way firewall. The existing firewall vendors are already probably having their lawyers draw up anti-trust charges against Microsoft. -- -- Join Red Room Forum BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com My Web Page | |
|
 |  |  Done_Posting Shoot to kill Premium join:2003-08-22 Toledo, OH | Re: FIRST POST I've also read that the two-way firewall is supposed to make an appearance in XP/SP3 when it's realeased later this year.
- Tate -- "I may work for a cable ISP, but I'm still an okay guy." | |
|
 |  |  |
 |   BillRoland Premium join:2001-01-21 Ocala, FL clubs:
·Cox HSI
| said by Steve :said by LiberalKing : First moron, more like it. said by the article :
it was not really designed to stop programs from getting out (phoning home) Is "was in no way designed for" different from "was not really designed for" ? I think the latter suggests a minor effort which expects to fail, while the former suggests that the issue was not addressed in any way. The XP/SP2 firewall is strictly inbound - by design - and though one can make a fair case for a firewall in both directions, hinting that XP/SP2 doesn't do such a good job on the outbound side is really disingenuous. Steve Amen Steve . I'd really like to know why an inbound only firewall failing an outboung firewall test, is news? -- "Don't steal. The government hates competition." | |
|
 |   micl Visit Lovely Downtown Port Starboard Premium join:2001-10-25 Silver Spring, MD
| I remember when a firewall meant it blocked in-bound *and* outbound. If it just blocks in-bound, is it really a firewall just because someone calls it a firewall? Or is it just NAT? -- If I don't see you in the future, I'll see you in the pasture | |
|
 |  |   Steve I'm a PC, so shut up Consultant join:2001-03-10 Yorba Linda, CA
| Re: FIRST POST said by micl :I remember when a firewall meant it blocked in-bound *and* outbound. That's never been the definition: a firewall is a device which applies access policy to network traffic, and the administrator can define it in any direction as he wishes.
In 1994 I was setting up Livingston Portmaster routers with fairly extensive filtering rules, and just because I chose to employ no outbound protection doesn't mean that it wasn't a firewall.
And the XP firewall isn't do NAT anyway.
Steve -- Stephen J. Friedl Unix Wizard Microsoft Security MVP Tustin, California USA my web site | |
|
 |  |  |   AnonName
@kaballero.com
| Re: FIRST POST Ah, the Portmaster... I remember them well. I managed a few of them.
Great device, I liked it better than the Cisco 52xx and 53xx RAS servers but a hundred and twenty modems is just a mess of wires and cables.
Ever work with a DiGi board? I still have a couple of those around 
-m-
The complements were intended not snide. I'm looking to bury the hatchet, not sharpen it.
| |
|
  JoeOnSunset Doublethink Is Doubleplus Ungood. Premium join:2002-11-25 Ormond Beach, FL
| This makes me want to bang my head on a table. Why is it news that software not designed to do something, lo and behold, doesn't do that thing? Arrrg! Here's a newsflash: I designed a great new test suite and found out that my television fails miserably at recording to DVDs. It wasn't really designed to be a DVD recorder, you see. | |
|
 |   fireflier Coffee. . .Need Coffee Premium join:2001-05-25 Limbo | Re: FIRST POST LOL. I have a toaster oven that keeps shocking the crap out of me when I try to make margaritas with it. Why won't my TOASTER OVEN make margaritas???
Next. . . -- I'd kill for a Nobel peace prize! | |
|
 |
|
 |