
how-to block ads
|
 micl Visit Lovely Downtown Port Starboard Premium join:2001-10-25 Silver Spring, MD
| Re: FIRST POST I remember when a firewall meant it blocked in-bound *and* outbound. If it just blocks in-bound, is it really a firewall just because someone calls it a firewall? Or is it just NAT? -- If I don't see you in the future, I'll see you in the pasture | |
|   Steve I'm a PC, so shut up Consultant join:2001-03-10 Yorba Linda, CA
| Re: FIRST POST said by micl :I remember when a firewall meant it blocked in-bound *and* outbound. That's never been the definition: a firewall is a device which applies access policy to network traffic, and the administrator can define it in any direction as he wishes.
In 1994 I was setting up Livingston Portmaster routers with fairly extensive filtering rules, and just because I chose to employ no outbound protection doesn't mean that it wasn't a firewall.
And the XP firewall isn't do NAT anyway.
Steve -- Stephen J. Friedl Unix Wizard Microsoft Security MVP Tustin, California USA my web site | |
|  |   AnonName
@kaballero.com
| Re: FIRST POST Ah, the Portmaster... I remember them well. I managed a few of them.
Great device, I liked it better than the Cisco 52xx and 53xx RAS servers but a hundred and twenty modems is just a mess of wires and cables.
Ever work with a DiGi board? I still have a couple of those around 
-m-
The complements were intended not snide. I'm looking to bury the hatchet, not sharpen it.
| |
|  | |  |
|