Defcon888
Premium
join:2003-07-22
San Bruno, CA | reply to Jrb2
Re: AntiVirus Poll 2006
So far, I'm only using Kaspersky. |
|
Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN |  reply to Jrb2
Avast Professional Edition (Licensed) |
|
Diazruanova
Premium
join:2004-08-13
Mexico
| reply to ePCdoctor
said by ePCdoctor  :said by John2g :said by ePCdoctor :Panda Hands down is the best You really should declare your bias: You work for Panda! That would be true saying that I do work for Panda Software, but really being honest I have seen all the ones mentioned and still would say that Panda is the best out there doing what its designed to do. This may not be true for everyones because of the situations and software that they run on their machines will be different. There is not one Antivirus out there that will detect 100%, but the technology behind what Panda uses with its TruPrevent keeps the unknown threats at bay. See how TruPrevent works » www.pandasoftware.com/about/pres···_tec.swf Come on, on most of the latest tests, Trueprevent has not been on par with one of the trully best Heuristics , and this comes from Bitdefender.
--
Diazruanova |
|
ePCdoctor
Panda Security US
Premium
join:2000-06-21
Glendale, CA
clubs:  
1 edit | said by Diazruanova :Come on, on most of the latest tests, Trueprevent has not been on par with one of the trully best Heuristics , and this comes from Bitdefender. hmmm
--
|AIM Me| Execute with Deadly Silence, Terminate with Extreme Prejudice |ePCdoctor.com|Skype Me| |
|
rb2006
join:2006-03-25
Grafton, OH
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| Voted both AntiVir and Avast.
AntiVir has worked great for the past few years on my XP, but I don't like the v7 update. I've also seen it b0rk on a few Win98 systems, so for those I've replaced it with Avast (with all the extras turned off). Avast seems to work well even though it didn't have the greatest detection rates last time I checked. |
|
