Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T & Verizon Forced to offer 'Naked' DSL » It would be a great day...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
does this apply to 3rd party DSL service? »
« Get ready  
AuthorAll Replies


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME


1 edit
reply to scooby
Re: It would be a great day...

Well, it totals out pretty expensive after all the taxes and fees:
Local + LD + taxes and fees (w 500 minutes ld, + caller ID and discounted Canada calling) works out to be ~$48/month.

Local plan: Personal Choice = $21.95
LD plan: International Saver II $2.95 + Value Plus 500 $13.00 = $15.95
Total: $37.90
Fees/taxes: $13.82
Bill Total: $51.72
Fees + Taxes = 26.7% of my bill!!

shashinka

join:2000-09-16
West Boylston, MA
reply to scooby
When I had Verizon service it was about $34 per month for unlimited local, caller id, call waiting, and maybe anonymous call reject. This was total after tax. Ridiculous.


scooby
Premium
join:2001-05-01
Schaumburg, IL

reply to en102
I wish our phone service was that cheap. Basic phone service in mid-Michigan with no features and the minimum local call package (required) comes out to about $26.70 a month with fees, taxes, and 911. Add $12.95 plus fees and its just about the same price as Comcast.


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME


1 edit
reply to Heterman
you know I'm putting this in as an example...
AT&T just call 300 = $16.00
AT&T Canada Plus = $5.95
= $22.00
Add in a few extra minutes of use, and I'm at $23 pretty easily.

Most of the former SBC discount programs require local+ld

The point I'm trying to make is that AT&T does not want to 'lose' any money by opening up local+ld to VoIP competition.
I expect prices to rise after 1year contracts, and a HUGE push for the ADSL2+/VDSL higher speed/rates to be able to able to attempt to compete with cable for speed (and be able to charge more $$$). The possible benefit will be the IPTV, which I don't expect to really do all that well unless they can sell it relatively cheap.
Forums » AT&T & Verizon Forced to offer 'Naked' DSLdoes this apply to 3rd party DSL service? »
« Get ready  


Friday, 04-Dec 23:17:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [71] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· ZR1 VS The USN Blue Angels! [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· IPComms Free DIDs now with sip registration maybe?? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Unlock] TUTORIAL: VONAGE WRTP54G/RTP300 WITH 5.01.04 [VOIP Tech Chat]