b_p_smith
join:2002-02-13
 ·RipNet
| reply to WirelessPlz
Re: RipNET Wireless Broadband
They keep messing around with the plans. They used to have more plan options and the one I'm on is no longer listed. The base plan used to be 1Meg/256k and 10Gig/month. Looks like they went for faster but less download.
Frankly, I'd be *hugely* surprised if you'd get line-of-sight from where you are. There are some hills between you and the tower just south of Kemptville. Unless you're really really lucky, expect talk of a tower. But if you're on top of a hill, that'll help.
I can't really speak to gaming performance, but I use VPN into work regularly and it's solid. I know of some VOIP users who have not complained of any packet loss. That implies reasonable ping times, but if there's a specific test you'd like me to try, lemme know.
You are aware that Storm supposedly has coverage in your area. I thought they had a tower in Winchester now. The company is a PITA to deal with, but you might want to keep that option open.
There's also a new wireless service in the early stages south of Ottawa, but I don't think they're operational yet.
Country living. You gotta love it. 
--
RipNet (wireless) -} WinXP -} WinProxy 4 -} LinkSys BEFSR81 -} about 8 machines running 98/2003/XP/CE |
|
WirelessPlz
join:2004-08-11
canada
·Bell Sympatico
1 edit | I would also be quite suprised if I can get LOS.
What's keeping my hopes up, is that they apparently have some Morewood customers(don't ask me how they get LOS, but obviously they do).
I am aware of Storm. They have a tower up in Russell, which is close to my place, but unfortunately for me, I would need to install a tower due to a huge tree in between my house and the Russell water tower(I can see the water tower at this time of year, but when folliage kicks in, it's a different story).
They even have a Point-to-Point connection setup in Morewood that gets feed from the tower in Embrun, but it's only in LOS to closest neighbours. So bummer for me on that one as well.
btw, I do agree about the PITA statement, I did not like their service one bit(being a few calls and a site survey).
RipNET should be at my place either tomorrow or thursday to complete a site survey. Let's keep the hopes up .
For the ping times, you can try some ping [server name or ip] -n 10.
Once again, thank you for all the precious information.
-Jean |
|
b_p_smith
join:2002-02-13
·RipNet
| How's this:
Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [68.142.226.55] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 68.142.226.55: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=53
Reply from 68.142.226.55: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=53
Reply from 68.142.226.55: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=53
Reply from 68.142.226.55: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=53
Reply from 68.142.226.55: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
Reply from 68.142.226.55: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=52
Reply from 68.142.226.55: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=53
Reply from 68.142.226.55: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=53
Reply from 68.142.226.55: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
Reply from 68.142.226.55: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
Ping statistics for 68.142.226.55:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 43ms, Maximum = 57ms, Average = 46ms
--
RipNet (wireless) -} WinXP -} WinProxy 5 -} LinkSys BEFSR81 -} about 8 machines running Win2003 & XP |
|
WirelessPlz
join:2004-08-11
canada
·Bell Sympatico
| Thanks for the reply. Those ping times are very nice
As an update, the site survey was completed today(ya, took them a whole week to get here :\), and it turns out we have perfect signal to their tower!
So, I should get hooked up sometimes this week. |
|
