republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Report: U.S. Broadband Not So Hot » To far behind already?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
broadband is bad »
« The market doesn't demand it  
AuthorAll Replies


Cheese
Premium
join:2003-10-26
Naples, FL
clubs:

reply to Karl Bode
Re: To far behind already?

said by Karl Bode See Profile :

I don't think it would be that hard, but it would require steps that share-holders and free-market fans wouldn't like.

That would include government involvement in the infrastructure process, including setting deployment water-marks (and actually enforcing them), correcting the corruption in the USF system and perhaps expanding its function (not just eliminating it), and not cow-towing to telco & cable lobbyists at every turn.

None of that will ever happen, as the political system now serves the will of the largest incumbents, not the public.
Well said.


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
Also putting a technologist at the head of the FCC instead of an empty-headed think-tank deregulatory drone would be a good move as well.


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US

said by Karl Bode See Profile :

Also putting a technologist at the head of the FCC instead of an empty-headed think-tank deregulatory drone would be a good move as well.
I agree with everything you just said but I'm sure you also know that these things never gonna happen - unless we disband this rotten FCC and forget it forever. We need a completely different communication market approach.

Sorry, we tried this - during last decades it didn't work out, by now it's completely ridden by corruption. Kill it.


packetscan
Premium
join:2004-10-19
Bridgeport, CT
clubs:
i'm not sure about total disassemble #5..

But Serious Chances need to be made. I can agree to that.
--
Who do you want to pay off today?


idjk

@144.226.x.x

It is not just the FCC -try to place fiber in the ground and you have all local governments plus the EPA in your pocket- then the are the tree huggers 'who sometime are right' so it is hard to compare USA with third world or not where there are less hoops to jump thru.
Also USA got in this early so it is a replacement not new which means you pay for it twice.
Forums » Report: U.S. Broadband Not So Hotbroadband is bad »
« The market doesn't demand it  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 13:08:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [71] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [65] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [58] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· The aftermath [World of Warcraft]
· Smoke detectors gone wild [Home Repair & Improvement]
· ICC strats [World of Warcraft]
· Holmes on Homes and HGTV in General [Home Repair & Improvement]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· SB6120 Firmware update [Comcast HSI]
· HOA Headaches [General Questions]