republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Global Broadband Stats » how 'bout busting a myth rant?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« US penetration  
AuthorAll Replies

Leod

join:2005-11-07
Baton Rouge, LA

reply to oliphant
Re: how 'bout busting a myth rant?

If Americans didn't want it, the number of subscriptions wouldn't be growing as much as it has. It'd be shrinking or be fairly stagnant right? Verizon probably wouldn't even bother with their FIOS service yet (though, FIOS can and does provide other services other than pure internet access.) People wouldn't be voting to put in fiber in their own communities if they were satisfied. People simply aren't satisfied with the money they are paying for the service they are getting. You may disagree that a government based solution is the right one but you can't dismiss that people have voted for it in their respective communities. There are simply too many benefits for faster broadband that we shouldn't or even can't ignore. While I don't expect your opinion to change over a simple forum reply, I do think you should think from the other side of things.


FTCXtreme

join:2005-03-14
New Braintree, MA

reply to pnh102
I dont live way out in the boondocks. Infact the closest cirty with 100+ population(Worcestor, MA) is about 30 minutes away. I live a mile away from the closest cable. My rough estimate is that 30% of this town can get DSL. Do I want broadband, heck yes. Am i entitle to have it, No. Broadband is a nice thing to have. The US is doing fine, and before this all spins off into some anti president Bush argument. Expect broadband to grow alot more, our economy is turning around, jobs are being created, unemployment has dropped.


oliphant
I Have 8 Boobies
Premium
join:2004-11-26
Corona, CA
reply to wolfhouse
Quality isn't up to par based on what? Do you have reliability statistics to share? They weren't part of this study.
--
WAR HAS NEVER SOLVED ANYTHING, except ending slavery, facism, communism, Nazism....

wolfhouse

join:2001-03-01
Union City, NJ

reply to oliphant
said by oliphant See Profile :

But we don't know...it could just as easily and IMO more likely that we have other sources for entertainment and information so broadband isn't needed, thus not as "wanted".
Once again I don't want to speculate about the availability number, but the quality is certainly not up to par. That is a fact.


oliphant
I Have 8 Boobies
Premium
join:2004-11-26
Corona, CA

reply to wolfhouse
But we don't know...it could just as easily and IMO more likely that we have other sources for entertainment and information so broadband isn't needed, thus not as "wanted".
--
WAR HAS NEVER SOLVED ANYTHING, except ending slavery, facism, communism, Nazism....

wolfhouse

join:2001-03-01
Union City, NJ

reply to oliphant
said by oliphant See Profile :

What do these statistics say about availability? NOTHING. Just because people don't WANT it doesn't mean they can't GET it.
This is true, but this might also be a reflection of the quality/price of the broadband. I think THIS is definitely an issue with broadband in the US right now. It is not that fast, and it is often more expensive than what you would get in other countries.


oliphant
I Have 8 Boobies
Premium
join:2004-11-26
Corona, CA
reply to Shark_615
What do these statistics say about availability? NOTHING. Just because people don't WANT it doesn't mean they can't GET it.
--
WAR HAS NEVER SOLVED ANYTHING, except ending slavery, facism, communism, Nazism....


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to Shark_615
said by Shark_615 See Profile :

Using your logic the states should have no problem. The majority of the US population is located in or around major urban centres.
And most of those places have broadband.
said by Shark_615 See Profile :

Besides there are many towns and cities that are not along the border of the US that have connectivity.
And I am sure there are some other places in bumblehick which don't.

The bottom line is that anyone in the USA who lives near civilization has at least one broadband option. The situation isn't as dire as the article makes it out to be.
--
Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!

Shark_615

join:2006-01-17
Pickering, ON
reply to pnh102
Using your logic the states should have no problem. The majority of the US population is located in or around major urban centres.

Besides there are many towns and cities that are not along the border of the US that have connectivity.
Forums » Global Broadband Stats« US penetration  


Saturday, 05-Dec 04:53:02 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [90] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· Best Instances to Farm for Phat Gold [World of Warcraft]