Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Making Cable More IPTV-Like » Bandwitdth issues?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

GhostDoggy

join:2005-05-11
Duluth, GA

reply to moonpuppy
Re: Bandwitdth issues?

Currently, all channels are being broadcasted simultaneously while the operators are still offering 5, 10, and even +15Mbps Internet connectivity. They are suggesting that the average number of 'watched' channels at any given time is actually lower than the total number of channels.

As a result and the new ability to selectively not simultaneously broadcast all channels to the home they can find more useful ways of using recycled bandwidth. While faster internet connectivity is one of them, this could also allow for more higher-bandwidth channels (e.g. HD).

For instance, let's say that a cable operator routines broadcasts 200 channels simultaneously, but at any given time in their network only 150 are being watched. Since Internet connectivity is 'best effort' then the variable performance is already allowed and afforded.

Personally, they all need a better approach (deploy GigE FTTH!).


dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

said by GhostDoggy See Profile :

Currently, all channels are being broadcasted simultaneously while the operators are still offering 5, 10, and even +15Mbps Internet connectivity. They are suggesting that the average number of 'watched' channels at any given time is actually lower than the total number of channels.

As a result and the new ability to selectively not simultaneously broadcast all channels to the home they can find more useful ways of using recycled bandwidth. While faster internet connectivity is one of them, this could also allow for more higher-bandwidth channels (e.g. HD).

For instance, let's say that a cable operator routines broadcasts 200 channels simultaneously, but at any given time in their network only 150 are being watched. Since Internet connectivity is 'best effort' then the variable performance is already allowed and afforded.

Personally, they all need a better approach (deploy GigE FTTH!).
While there are "Access to over 300 channels" there are only like 30 that get wide viewership not including premium channels.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth
Forums » Making Cable More IPTV-Like


Tuesday, 10-Nov 08:40:28 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [88] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [83] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [33] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [15] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [11] Monday Evening Links
· [9] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [6] AT&T Launching New 7.2 Mbps 3G Modem
· [1] Sprint Announces Job Cuts
· [0] Tuesday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· How in the world am I going to get into college? [General Questions]
· Sigh...time to switch from WindowMaker [All Things Unix]
· A fishy CRTC tarriff filed by bell? [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Wood floor opinion... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· 60 Minutes piece on cyber security last night [Security]
· [WIN7] Standby mode. Is it just a dream? [Microsoft Help]
· Your ideal heroic 5-man class comp! [World of Warcraft]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October 13, 2009 [Security]