Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Making Cable More IPTV-Like » Bandwitdth issues?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

reply to GhostDoggy
Re: Bandwitdth issues?

said by GhostDoggy See Profile :

Currently, all channels are being broadcasted simultaneously while the operators are still offering 5, 10, and even +15Mbps Internet connectivity. They are suggesting that the average number of 'watched' channels at any given time is actually lower than the total number of channels.

As a result and the new ability to selectively not simultaneously broadcast all channels to the home they can find more useful ways of using recycled bandwidth. While faster internet connectivity is one of them, this could also allow for more higher-bandwidth channels (e.g. HD).

For instance, let's say that a cable operator routines broadcasts 200 channels simultaneously, but at any given time in their network only 150 are being watched. Since Internet connectivity is 'best effort' then the variable performance is already allowed and afforded.

Personally, they all need a better approach (deploy GigE FTTH!).
While there are "Access to over 300 channels" there are only like 30 that get wide viewership not including premium channels.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth

GhostDoggy

join:2005-05-11
Duluth, GA

reply to moonpuppy
Currently, all channels are being broadcasted simultaneously while the operators are still offering 5, 10, and even +15Mbps Internet connectivity. They are suggesting that the average number of 'watched' channels at any given time is actually lower than the total number of channels.

As a result and the new ability to selectively not simultaneously broadcast all channels to the home they can find more useful ways of using recycled bandwidth. While faster internet connectivity is one of them, this could also allow for more higher-bandwidth channels (e.g. HD).

For instance, let's say that a cable operator routines broadcasts 200 channels simultaneously, but at any given time in their network only 150 are being watched. Since Internet connectivity is 'best effort' then the variable performance is already allowed and afforded.

Personally, they all need a better approach (deploy GigE FTTH!).
Forums » Making Cable More IPTV-Like


Saturday, 05-Dec 08:41:19 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [92] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [84] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [79] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Road Runnner up to 50 mbps is ready ! [Road Runner]
· [Business] how to bridge a smc 8014 business class modem [Comcast HSI]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]