|
Dell Dimension E310I bought this computer some months ago. After getting it, I noticed the new 64-bit proccessors and I felt a bit disappointed that I didnt get the "new generation" of CPU's.
My dell is a: 3.0Ghz 1G RAM
However, today I was messing with the BIOS in order to change the boot order and I came across the "system information" and it had fields like "HyperThreading: Yes" and then on the bottom I read this "64-bit: EM64T or EM64R (cant remember)".
I was certain that my computer was still 32-bit, but does this say it is in fact 64-bit and I can make use of it (if any)?
Can you please explain me what does this mean and the difference? Thanks. |
|
decx Premium Member join:2002-06-07 Vancouver, BC 1 edit |
decx
Premium Member
2006-May-5 11:29 pm
If the processor in your computer is the P4 531 (the P4 3GHz Dell is currently showing in the E310 specs) then it does support EM64T. For more info on what 64 bit support visit: » en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit |
|
|
How can I know if that is the CPU I have?
Besides that, if it is in fact that CPU and supports EM64T, does it make it a 64-bit CPU?
I just tried to run a chess engine that is written for 64-bit but it didnt open, when I tried the 32-bit version, it worked...Any clarification? |
|
decx Premium Member join:2002-06-07 Vancouver, BC |
decx
Premium Member
2006-May-6 12:00 am
In System Properties. In WinXp right click "My Computer" then click on Properties. The processor will show under the "computer" section on the first tab. Or you can download a CPUID utility like CPU-Z. |
|
BA MVM join:2001-05-24 Vancouver, BC |
to Grothendieck
said by Grothendieck:Besides that, if it is in fact that CPU and supports EM64T, does it make it a 64-bit CPU? Yes, EM64T is Intel's name for x86 64-bit technology. said by Grothendieck:I just tried to run a chess engine that is written for 64-bit but it didnt open, when I tried the 32-bit version, it worked...Any clarification? That program likely requires a 64-bit version of Windows, such as Windows XP Pro x64 Edition. |
|
|
In the system properties. It shows this:
Dell Dimension DV051 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.0GHz. |
|
decx Premium Member join:2002-06-07 Vancouver, BC |
decx
Premium Member
2006-May-6 12:33 am
said by Grothendieck:In the system properties. It shows this: Dell Dimension DV051 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.0GHz. Hmm you'll probably need something like CPU-Z to show the actual processor model. But I'm almost certain you have a P4 531 in there. |
|
|
I have a 630. |
|
|
decx Premium Member join:2002-06-07 Vancouver, BC |
decx
Premium Member
2006-May-6 12:41 am
Guess Dell used a different processor without updating their specs sheets. Anyways, here's the basic specs on your processor:» processorfinder.intel.co ··· ec=SL7Z9 |
|
|
This processor supports Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology (EM64T).
So I have a 64-bit proccessor?
Is it worth it to get the XP x64 or it doesnt matter? Is it free? Thanks. |
|
decx Premium Member join:2002-06-07 Vancouver, BC |
decx
Premium Member
2006-May-6 12:48 am
For the majority of users, currently it's not really worth getting the 64 bit version of XP (it's not free by the way). The advantages are just not there at the moment. |
|
|
Ok thanks a lot. |
|
|
to Grothendieck
Why on God's Green Earth did you buy a Dell? They are the worst PC's out there. But, seriously, you need to get the P4 to emulate the AMD instruction set, and you have discovered that's called the EM64T. Then you will need the X64 version of XP, which you can download a demo here: » www.microsoft.com/window ··· ial.mspxHowever, they "forget" to mention the cost, but I thought it was an upgrade from Pro for like $20 or so. However, I'd just return the Dell and buy a good computer (hint: something not from Dell) - you'll thank me for it later! |
|
|
said by itguy05:Why on God's Green Earth did you buy a Dell? They are the worst PC's out there. But, seriously, you need to get the P4 to emulate the AMD instruction set, and you have discovered that's called the EM64T. Then you will need the X64 version of XP, which you can download a demo here: » www.microsoft.com/window ··· ial.mspxHowever, they "forget" to mention the cost, but I thought it was an upgrade from Pro for like $20 or so. However, I'd just return the Dell and buy a good computer (hint: something not from Dell) - you'll thank me for it later! I normally don't rise to bait like this but oh well. There isn't anything wrong with Dell, their PCs are a good cost effective choice for a huge number of people. The company I work for has about 75 Dells in the office I work in, and I can remember 0 problems in the last year. As for emulation, instruction are instructions. There is no emulating going on. IMHO, similar thinking about the 64 bit instruction set can be applied the SSE2 SSE3 etc instructions, originally conceived by Intel but also offered by AMD. For me, on my A64, SSE 2 is far more valuable than the 64 bit thing. Park the fanboy crap at the door please. |
|
|
to Grothendieck
quote: There isn't anything wrong with Dell, their PCs are a good cost effective choice for a huge number of people.
The company I work for has about 75 Dells in the office I work in, and I can remember 0 problems in the last year.
I've seen lots and lots of PC's over the years. Dell has never made a good box. I could write a book on why not to buy a Dell - but that's a topic for another time and place. There are those (few) that have had no problems with Yugos but that doesn't make them good cars. GM cars are cost effective for a huge number of people. Doesn't make them good cars.... Most computer places can undercut Dell's pricing (it's not all that good or hard to do) and overcut them on service and quality. There is a reson most home users don't use Dell and most computer sales are not Dell (something like 70% are not Dell). quote: As for emulation, instruction are instructions. There is no emulating going on.
Poor choice of words. Yes, they run natively. But it's not the IA64 extensions, which are the realm of Itanic err, Itanium. That's an inportant distinction, especially when you are looking for drivers.... quote: Park the fanboy crap at the door please.
No fanboy stuff, just the cold hard truth. |
|
decx Premium Member join:2002-06-07 Vancouver, BC |
decx
Premium Member
2006-May-29 11:52 am
Dell really isn't that bad. Sure, many people can build a better PC, but for a big name PC manufacturer, I consider Dell to be one of the good ones. Their quality and support is better than quite a few of their competitors. And as for pricing, they can be expensive if you want a high end system, but for low end word processing/internet computers, I can't put together a system with monitor, keyboard, and mouse that matches their price.
For many people who want a cheap everyday computer, and those who need a lot of tech support I would still recommend they get a Dell. |
|
your moderator at work
hidden :
|
dragon MVM, join:2001-01-30 Spring, TX |
to Grothendieck
Re: Dell Dimension E310AHEM!!! let's mind our manners and stay on topic, please. thanks. |
|
stevephl join:2000-11-27 Colorado Springs, CO |
to itguy05
If Dell sells more computers then the rest of them put together then how do you come up with your figures?
At work all of our computers including servers are Dell they simply work. The Compaq's and HP's have all bit the dust with the HP's going first.
Of all the friends I have who have had a computer more then 3 years they are all Dell.
None of the current crop of computers or computer components are up to the same standards we had 10 years ago. They are all cheaply manufactured in Communist China. |
|
|
quote: If Dell sells more computers then the rest of them put together then how do you come up with your figures?
Dell has less than 30% of the market for PC's. That's nowhere near more computers than the rest of them put together. In fact, most computer purchasers do not choose Dell. |
|