phoneboy2
@shawcable.net
| reply to cybersank
Re: Deploying over 90 squared km: Wimax or not?
Radialink,
Thanks for that info. That is what I have been able to piece together as well. So you are agreeing that the real world results with the NexNet gear is similar to what people can expect from 802.16-2004 gear right? From what I have read it is very similar multipath, modulation, MAC control and all. Basically all of the biggies of WiMAX. They are calling it pre-WiMAX. At least Bell/Rogers are on their websites.
802.16e (802.16-2005) promises to improve on NLOS and distance so maybe that will actually reach 5km NLOS with indoor CPE. Sounds like it's worth waiting for anyways. |
|
cmaenginsb
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-19
Palmdale, CA | reply to cybersank
Gino, check out Aperto. |
|
garport
join:2004-09-03
CO
| reply to cybersank
We are deploying a Wimax network of 105 RadioBases at 3.5Ghz. We have NLOS with zero install at 1.5Km of radius coverage. We have 42Mhz, we use FDD with 21Mhz uplink and 21Mhz for downlink, and for radio planning we use sectors of 3.5Mhz with a real rate of 10Mbps at 64QAM. |
|
John Galt
Forward, March
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
 ·CenturyLink
| said by garport  :We are deploying a Wimax network of 105 RadioBases at 3.5Ghz. We have NLOS with zero install at 1.5Km of radius coverage. We have 42Mhz, we use FDD with 21Mhz uplink and 21Mhz for downlink, and for radio planning we use sectors of 3.5Mhz with a real rate of 10Mbps at 64QAM. What's the noise floor in your service area?
--
A is A |
|
