Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » If FCC Broadband Data is Wrong... » About time
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
well isn't that strange »
« As Long As We're On the Subject of the FCC  
AuthorAll Replies


rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Sprint Mobile Broa..


2 edits
reply to AHomeBoy2000
Re: WiMax for All- Ok, for Some!

You obviously haven't read up on wireless. Wimax is nothing but hopes and dreams and nothing factual, just like powerline broadband. You can't change the fundamentals of wireless.. After all can You imagine Any cell phone tower that serves a whole town?
Wireless can only do so much, 802.11B/G AP's can only do a max of 50 clients or so. Canopy systems can handle as many as 100 clients. Canopy systems start at about 20 grand..
Plus
$6000 tower, securing tower locations by buying/leasing land
Securing a backbone internet provider

Another thing is that EACH of those clients are going to have to have a equipment at their end.. and that's NOT a wireless NIC from wal-mart..
Besides all this, only 2.4/5.8GHz and 900Mhz are non licenced frequencies.. this means that something as simple as a cordless phone can cause enough noise to disrupt equipment in the area.

To make wireless Appealing to entrepreneurs the FCC needs to have a dedicated, licenced frequency to specialty WISP's so that they can work without noise. And with a training program, and even better some sort of grant to start them off.

Wireless is NOT a cheap way of doing things, which is what they ARE looking for.. nothing will beat a landline fiber optic system
Either the FCC needs to establish a company to provide BB to rual areas and have it funded by something such as local taxes, or Force telco's to wire them.
All and all this is a huge mess that's gone to shit creek
--
"Hows your French toast?" "Smelly and ungrateful, but this AMERICAN toast is great!"
Forums » If FCC Broadband Data is Wrong...well isn't that strange »
« As Long As We're On the Subject of the FCC  


Sunday, 06-Dec 03:15:28 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [123] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [82] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [75] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· [DNS] Google's public DNS... performance increases? [Comcast HSI]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· Ottawa South Highspeed - Initial Review [Canadian Broadband]
· Blue Ray: Samsung BD-P3600 or LG BD390 [Audio/Video Chat]