republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Amazon VP on Net-Neutrality » I really don't care
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Amazon telling us the obvious  
AuthorAll Replies

Ahrenl

join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA
·Verizon FIOS

reply to viperlmw
Re: I really don't care

1.The problem with competing with a mon/duopoly is that they price you out of the market wherever you start. Ask RCN all about it.

2.Subsidized becomes the same thing when your talking about billions and billion of tax breaks. If they collected all that money and then handed it right back to them it would amount to the same thing.

3.Not if done like the Utopia project, where the muni only builds the network and allows the private sector to compete on it on an even playing field. This actually works MUCH better.

4.BPL? laugh. (there's an article on the front page making fun of BPL progress just today 5/12) Satelite competes with dial-up, not broadband.

viperlmw
Premium
join:2005-01-25
·Qwest.net

reply to LilYoda
Because noone has pockets deep enough to compete with telcos and cablecos.
Oh, there's plenty of money out there: private investment groups, Microsoft, etc. If there was money to be made, they would do it.

Because the last mile infrastructure of the telcos was installed and paid for by your tax dollars, and that anyone wanting to do this on his own would be bankrupt before even starting.
While some of it could have been considered SUBSIDIZED, not 'paid for' (mostly just in the form of granting rights of way, not direct cash payments, AT&T actually 'paid' to install all nationwide infrastructure.

Because whenever a city tries to do so with its taxpayers money (and after said taxpayers vote that they are wanting their tax dollars to be spent like that), they are being sued into oblivion by the telcos (See Lafayette, LA)
This is an issue of government competing with the private sector in an area that has been, and should continue to be in the realm of private enterprise.

Today, I think noone except WISPs in very rural areas can think about competing against the duopoly.
I can think of 2, satellite and bpl. But again, if there were money to be made, someone would do it. The Bell System spent over a century installing the current copper telecom network. Have some patience. Someone else may do the same.
Forums » Amazon VP on Net-Neutrality« Amazon telling us the obvious  


Saturday, 28-Nov 22:26:17 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [71] Weekend Open Thread
· [70] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Why does it take so long? Mail question [General Questions]
· Why would I want an e reader? [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Anyone have a problem [Software]
· Digital Transport Adapter Unboxing Photos [Comcast Cable TV]