33591094
join:2002-11-19
Canada | reply to Jonbo298
Re: wow.... idiots!
What? Shrink the large countries down to their size? |
|
DaSneaky1D
one wall to block them all
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
The Lou
 ·Charter Pipeline
| said by 33591094  :What? Shrink the large countries down to their size? It's not a size issue. It's a business mentality. Asian business models plan for the future, not the immediate return investment.
If New York City operated in that manner, then we'll see PR's like this about them...
»newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2006/pro···=ILC-001
--
:: my trivial ramblings :: |
|
rit56
join:2000-12-01
New York, NY
| Ahhh pardon me Mister DaSneaky..... New York City currently is fiscally very healthy with a budget surplus..... this city is run very well considering it's size and population. if you mean private corporations that are headquartered here then that's another thing totally independent of New York.... |
|
bogey780
join:2004-03-19
Here | reply to DaSneaky1D
Japanese and Korean lawmakers are more agreeable when it comes to telecom laws. If you told Bell they didn't have to worry about being penalized for any network outlay then you'd see more outlays. |
|
DaSneaky1D
one wall to block them all
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
The Lou | reply to rit56
I meant the population density of NYC compared to Asian countries, not the city itself.
--
:: my trivial ramblings :: |
|
shashinka
join:2000-09-16
West Boylston, MA
1 edit | reply to DaSneaky1D
I know, I was just reading about that. Here I am trying to save some money going from Charter's shotty 3mb/256k service for $45 to Verizon's $25 (naked-dsl) 768k/128k. Verizon FIOS hurry up and deploy in Central Mass already! I had better choices and speeds 7-8 yrs ago when I lived in Okinawa, Japan. |
|
garagerock
Premium
join:2002-06-14
Louisville, KY
| reply to bogey780
said by bogey780 :Japanese and Korean lawmakers are more agreeable when it comes to telecom laws. If you told Bell they didn't have to worry about being penalized for any network outlay then you'd see more outlays. penalized by... |
|
Cod
join:2000-07-05
Greensboro, NC
| said by garagerock :penalized by... ...government regulation when competitors are not. |
|
AnonProxy
Proxy of Anon
Premium
join:2001-05-12
ß
| reply to DaSneaky1D
You are kidding right? Ever hear of economy of scale? It's very cost effective to put heavy/high throughput broadband in densely populated areas where the is a large customer base and ample infrastructure to support it.
They can "plan for the future" because the future of the customer base already exists. The whole country is only 374,744 sq km with like 128 million people. Doesn't take a lot of "planning" to figure out that customer base or even worry about the "last mile". |
|
garagerock
Premium
join:2002-06-14
Louisville, KY | reply to Cod
oh boo hoo. |
|
Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | reply to Cod
What competitors? |
|
Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | reply to AnonProxy
Canada is larger, less densley populated, and ranks higher on broadband per capita measures.. next excuse please.. |
|
BloodRoses
Gods lend wings to tainted hearts
Premium
join:2003-03-17
clubs: | Manhattan has a population density of 26,000 people per square kilometre, greater than that of Seoul or Tokyo. Yawn.
--
Cheers,
Stephanie - www.GlitterFaerie.com |
|
Cod
join:2000-07-05
Greensboro, NC
| reply to garagerock
said by garagerock :oh boo hoo. Real mature. It was an answer to a previous posters question. |
|
Cod
join:2000-07-05
Greensboro, NC
| reply to Ahrenl
said by Ahrenl :What competitors? Satellite, cable, VOIP, cell. Enough? |
|
bogey780
join:2004-03-19
Here | reply to BloodRoses
Well then I'm suprised that Manhattan Telephone and Telegraph hasn't deployed GigE all over the place. It's almost as if Manhattan isn't the only place the local telco serves. |
|
DSLTech
join:2000-12-30
San Jose, CA
| reply to Cod
I dont see sat/cell/voip competing with the ILECs. sat is pretty marginalized and too much latency. cell? well, ILEC's have that already. so they compete against themselves? voip? they have that too.
honestly, the only competition for high-speed internet is CABLE, and with Comcast at $45/mo, doesnt seem like they really see any competition. they KNOW if you cant get good dsl, you got them. thats that. |
|
JamesPC
join:2005-10-12
Orange, CA | reply to garagerock
Size does matter, when it comes to cost. |
|
garagerock
Premium
join:2002-06-14
Louisville, KY
| reply to Cod
said by Cod :said by garagerock :oh boo hoo. Real mature. It was an answer to a previous posters question. and your point is, Headmaster? gov't regulation is part of doing business. |
|
