Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Security Absurdity: A long-overdue wake up call
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Spycar suite of free Exploit Tests »
« Is there a harmeless virus that I can sent to myself to test  
AuthorAll Replies


N O Y B
St. John 3.16

join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR
·Verizon FIOS
·Comcast

reply to Kiwi
Re: Security Absurdity: A long-overdue wake up call

Yes, one should practice defensive driving so to speak. But there is still the other half of the equation which is the ISP should not knowingly allow illegal use of their network.

Moving off the road thing.

Suppose a corporation knowingly permits the use of their resources for illegal activity and does nothing meaningfully significant to prevent such activity, should they not be held responsible for resulting damages?

ISPs currently do knowingly permit the use of their resources (their privately owned and operated network) for illegal activity and in many cases could put automated systems in place to detect, block and shutdown offending customer connections.

devicenull
Premium
join:2002-12-01
Clifton, NJ

You have to be very careful automatically shutting down clients. What if I want to run a Nessus or Nmap scan on a server I own? With any type of automated system, you run the risk of it flagging that and taking action.. Server could have many IP addresses with different services on each..

Kiwi
Premium
join:2003-05-26
USA
·Comcast
·Aristotle Internet

reply to N O Y B
said by N O Y B See Profile :

Suppose a corporation knowingly permits the use of their resources for illegal activity and does nothing meaningfully significant to prevent such activity, should they not be held responsible for resulting damages?

ISPs currently do knowingly permit the use of their resources (their privately owned and operated network) for illegal activity and in many cases could put automated systems in place to detect, block and shutdown offending customer connections.
That's another and entirely separate issue, Network Administrators are accountable for knowing their job. Permissions and Admin rights are controlled, or should be. I think you are not entirely realistic in what an Admin does or is, in a corporate environment.

An ISP provides access to the net, they are not the Police.

Most users could do with censorship @ least @ some level, even on their own PC! Too many really stupid click happy idiots running around, infecting everyone with AIDS -Artificial & Indecent Decisions Serviced

Some people should simply be licensed, before they are allowed to access the net. But it's still not an ISP issue.

.


N O Y B
St. John 3.16

join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR
·Verizon FIOS
·Comcast

reply to devicenull
said by devicenull See Profile :

You have to be very careful automatically shutting down clients. What if I want to run a Nessus or Nmap scan on a server I own? With any type of automated system, you run the risk of it flagging that and taking action.. Server could have many IP addresses with different services on each..
And why would it ever need to repeatedly pound on mine or anyone’s firewall with unsolicited traffic?


N O Y B
St. John 3.16

join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR
·Verizon FIOS
·Comcast

reply to Kiwi
I didn’t say anything about network administrators. I said corporations.

I didn’t say ISP are the police. But neither am I, but I and they as well can be held accountable for negligence, i.e. knowingly permitting someone to use their resources (network) in pursuit of illegal activity.
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecuritySpycar suite of free Exploit Tests »
« Is there a harmeless virus that I can sent to myself to test  


Friday, 21-Nov 19:56:12 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [198] Obama FCC Selection Team Won't Make AT&T Happy
· [106] DSL's Not Dead Yet
· [84] Zone Alarm Pro Free Just For Today
· [80] Harvard Law Professor Sues RIAA
· [74] Storm Reviews Come Rolling In
· [67] New Xbox 360 'Experience' Goes Live
· [67] CRTC Rules Against Indie ISPs In Throttling Dispute
· [51] Cable Grabbing 71% Of New Broadband Customers
· [51] Just 26% of U.S. Broadband Users Faster Than 5Mbps
· [48] Comcast DOCSIS 3.0 Hits Pacific Northwest In December
Most people now reading
· CRTC ruling coming Thursday Nov 20 [TekSavvy]
· Appliance repair bill question. [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Pentagon Hit by Unprecedented Cyber Attack [Security]
· [iPhone] 2.2 out now [All things Macintosh]
· Core i7 or phenom 2? [PC gaming Tech]
· [WotLK] Championing explained [World of Warcraft]
· [Scam] Colbert & Johnson [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Is there any point now in switching? [TekSavvy]
· faster speeds [TekSavvy]
· Upgrades... What's next... [TekSavvy]