Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Security Absurdity: A long-overdue wake up call
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Spycar suite of free Exploit Tests »
« Is there a harmeless virus that I can sent to myself to test  
AuthorAll Replies


N O Y B
St. John 3.16

join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR

reply to Kiwi
Re: Security Absurdity: A long-overdue wake up call

Yes, one should practice defensive driving so to speak. But there is still the other half of the equation which is the ISP should not knowingly allow illegal use of their network.

Moving off the road thing.

Suppose a corporation knowingly permits the use of their resources for illegal activity and does nothing meaningfully significant to prevent such activity, should they not be held responsible for resulting damages?

ISPs currently do knowingly permit the use of their resources (their privately owned and operated network) for illegal activity and in many cases could put automated systems in place to detect, block and shutdown offending customer connections.

devicenull
Premium
join:2002-12-01
Clifton, NJ

You have to be very careful automatically shutting down clients. What if I want to run a Nessus or Nmap scan on a server I own? With any type of automated system, you run the risk of it flagging that and taking action.. Server could have many IP addresses with different services on each..

Kiwi
Premium
join:2003-05-26
USA
·Comcast
·Aristotle Internet

reply to N O Y B
said by N O Y B See Profile :

Suppose a corporation knowingly permits the use of their resources for illegal activity and does nothing meaningfully significant to prevent such activity, should they not be held responsible for resulting damages?

ISPs currently do knowingly permit the use of their resources (their privately owned and operated network) for illegal activity and in many cases could put automated systems in place to detect, block and shutdown offending customer connections.
That's another and entirely separate issue, Network Administrators are accountable for knowing their job. Permissions and Admin rights are controlled, or should be. I think you are not entirely realistic in what an Admin does or is, in a corporate environment.

An ISP provides access to the net, they are not the Police.

Most users could do with censorship @ least @ some level, even on their own PC! Too many really stupid click happy idiots running around, infecting everyone with AIDS -Artificial & Indecent Decisions Serviced

Some people should simply be licensed, before they are allowed to access the net. But it's still not an ISP issue.

.


N O Y B
St. John 3.16

join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR

reply to devicenull
said by devicenull See Profile :

You have to be very careful automatically shutting down clients. What if I want to run a Nessus or Nmap scan on a server I own? With any type of automated system, you run the risk of it flagging that and taking action.. Server could have many IP addresses with different services on each..
And why would it ever need to repeatedly pound on mine or anyone’s firewall with unsolicited traffic?


N O Y B
St. John 3.16

join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR

reply to Kiwi
I didn’t say anything about network administrators. I said corporations.

I didn’t say ISP are the police. But neither am I, but I and they as well can be held accountable for negligence, i.e. knowingly permitting someone to use their resources (network) in pursuit of illegal activity.
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecuritySpycar suite of free Exploit Tests »
« Is there a harmeless virus that I can sent to myself to test  


Tuesday, 08-Dec 17:38:38 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [191] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [71] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [49] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [49] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [42] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [36] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [18] Verizon Settles With NJ Over Misleading FiOS Marketing
Most people now reading
· Servers UP!!! [World of Warcraft]
· 3.3 Out today [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Triumph Emblems [World of Warcraft]
· World of Warcraft Client Patch 3.3 (12-8-2009) [World of Warcraft]
· Comcast Customers: Would You Prefer Metered Billing? [Comcast HSI]
· Account Hacked With Authenticator [World of Warcraft]
· What the heck is going on in SoCal - Part 3 [Road Runner]
· Top 10 things to do while servers are down! [World of Warcraft]
· World of Warcraft Client Patch 3.3.0 (12-08-2009) [World of Warcraft]