how-to block ads
|
Doctor Olds
I Need A Remedy For What's Ailing Me.
Premium,VIP
join:2001-04-19
1970 442 W30
clubs:
1 edit | reply to pivonka571
Re: Questions about reconnecting to ELN DSL service
said by pivonka571  :The new modem is a ZyXEL Prestige 645M-UHP. Remove/uninstall these items from their respective OS:
• Connection: WinPoET (iVasion) on Win 98 side.
• Connection: "WAN miniport (PPPOE)" on XP side
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »How to Reset TCP/IP in Windows XP
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »Uninstall and reinstall DUN and the TCP/IP protocol in Windows 98
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »What is a UHP modem?
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »How do I setup the UHP modem?
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »How can I tweak my connection for better speed and performance?
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »Where are the TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic Tool Locations?
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »What are some common household items that may cause interference with your DSL?
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »How do I isolate my DSL signal?
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »Where can I find Zyxel P645 UHP LED and Port Information?
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »How to Get to the Logs, the Diagnostics Page, and the DSL Statistics Page - UHP
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »What is Safe Mode?
»EarthLink DSL FAQ »How do I test at my NID? What does it look like?
Regards,
Doctor Olds
--
What’s the point of owning a supercar if you can’t scare yourself stupid from time to time? | |
pivonka571
join:2005-02-03
La Crosse, KS | reply to pivonka571
the 2wire speed test = DL @ 750Kbps
Toast.net speed test = DL @ 542Kbps
On the specific test at Toast the average result = 2021Kbps.
I have a problem, until I can make it Earthlink's problem - which I hope to do in short order. | |
pivonka571
join:2005-02-03
La Crosse, KS
| reply to pivonka571
The new modem is a ZyXEL Prestige 645M-UHP. Entering 172.16.0.254 in the address bar to access modem setup, as instructed by Earthlink, first produces an hourglass, then the message "The connection has timed out The server at 172.16.0.254 is taking too long to respond." etc.
Suggestions about the reasons for either the short term of my connection's link to the internet, the its apparent instability, and my inability to access the modem setup screen will be appreciated greatly.
Connections speeds, available when there is a connection, are reported as:
dslreports.com speed test result on 2006-05-19 20:37:08 EST:
702 / 101
Your download speed : 702 kbps or 87.8 KB/sec.
That is 62.9% worse than an average user on covad.net
Your upload speed : 101 kbps or 12.7 KB/sec.
That is 74.4% worse than an average user on covad.net Covad, very courteously, has noted the speed as much lower than the nominal speed of the line as provisioned, and that they were forced to use "stability mode" in provisioning it due to line problems. The cannot, however, do anything about those line problems until Earthlink consents to give them a work order. If anyone has advice for me about how to get Earthlink to do that, I will be EXTREMELY appreciative. | |
pivonka571
join:2005-02-03
La Crosse, KS
| reply to pivonka571
On April 24, 2006, my DSL service was unilaterally disconnected by Earthlink, apparently as a result of a decision to reprovision my service, changing it from UUnet to COVAD. It is now May 12, and I still do not have DSL service.
Christopher was cooperative and supportive, but could do nothing to correct the problem, and transferred me to another representative, who had to transfer me to still another representative, who actually had the power to get information about the status of my DSL line.
That representative advised me that the Westell Wirespeed modem I have used since February 23, 2000, to support my DSL service was not working with the the new COVAD provisioning I will be forced to accept a new modem, with a new "service agreement" of one year.
After the inconvenience of not having DSL service, and my inability to get Earthlink Customer Service representatives to address that problem, I am not at all happy to be forced into a one year extension of my service contract. However, when I protested that extension to the business office they were unwilling to listen or respond to my point of view by eliminating that extension.
At this point, I would definitely NOT recommend Earthlink to others, despite having done so repeatedly and enthusiastically for the last six years.
12:08 PM 5/19/06
Despite the commitment I received from Earthlink on May 12, 2006, that I would receive a new modem by May 15, that modem had not been shipped on May 16th when I called to check the status of the unreceived shipment. The modem had to be reordered, and arrived on May 18th.
I was able to establish a DSL connection of sorts using the new modem.
Well, kind of.
The new DSL line is quite unstable. Though the connection is only occasionally lost completely, the DSL line frequently loses its signal. I am unable to access www pages for more than a few minutes after establishing each connection. To browse, I have to disconnect, and then reconnect.
Connections are poor from the gitgo, as illustrated by pings to the ELN DNS servers.
~>ping 207.69.188.185
Pinging 207.69.188.185 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=57
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=57
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=57
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=399ms TTL=57
Ping statistics for 207.69.188.185:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 399ms, Average = 129ms
~>ping 207.69.188.185
Pinging 207.69.188.185 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=435ms TTL=57
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=57
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=57
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=57
Ping statistics for 207.69.188.185:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 435ms, Average = 139ms
~>ping 207.69.188.185
Pinging 207.69.188.185 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=57
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=57
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=57
Reply from 207.69.188.185: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=57
Ping statistics for 207.69.188.185:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 90ms, Average = 53ms | |
|
