Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Crying Net-Neutrality Wolf » Wrong.
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
133
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
An excellent argument as to why »
« Conversely  
AuthorAll Replies

dadarkside
Premium
join:2006-05-20
The Moon

reply to Karl Bode
Re: Not Wrong

said by Karl Bode See Profile :

I have magic beans I bought from a pretty pink dragon.
The dragon I bought mine from was red...

(oops, wrong thread!)


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
reply to insomniac84
I have magic beans I bought from a pretty pink dragon.


insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN
reply to Karl Bode
Do you work for these companies, how do you know?


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode See Profile :

Crying wolf to instances that clearly aren't intentional net-neutrality violations will only make it easier for lobbyists and PR firms to paint advocates as crackpots.
You mean advocates like Silicon Valley Watcher & IP Democracy? I think there is no dearth of crackpot net neutrality advocates out there to be used as examples by telco lobbyists.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
reply to insomniac84
BellSouth isn't going to target only Florida and Tennessee YouTube users.

Cox isn't going to filter Craigslist via an optional third-party security suite nobody likes.

Neither is going to outright block content while they're busy spending millions fighting net-neutrality laws. These execs are not stupid men. Myopic and greedy maybe, but not stupid.

They will wait until the legal debate is settled in their favor, then they will employ more subtle de-prioritization approaches.

Crying wolf to instances that clearly aren't intentional net-neutrality violations will only make it easier for lobbyists and PR firms to paint advocates as crackpots.


insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN


1 edit
Wrong.

"Similarly, crying wolf each time a network belches could hurt the case for net-neutrality by painting advocates as knee-jerk reactionaries"
Completely wrong. People are going to fuss because there is no guarantee in anyway that a network problem is just a network problem and not really intentional.
If it was illegal for ISPs to block or throttle websites, people wouldn't jump to that conclusion so fast.
Forums » Crying Net-Neutrality WolfAn excellent argument as to why »
« Conversely  


Friday, 27-Nov 23:41:23 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [121] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [61] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [39] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· 5 hour energy for diabetic [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· [Speed] Equipment Power Cycle Needed every 3 days [Comcast HSI]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Usenet through TSI really at 1 Mbps cap? [TekSavvy]