republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » House to Vote on Net-Neutrality COPE Amendment » Debate in progress on CSPAN on COPE Act
Uniqs:
267
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« ...  

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


3 edits

Debate in progress on CSPAN on COPE Act

The debate is currently in progress on CSPAN on any amendments to the COPE ACT. The debate and votes are expected on each amendment as it comes up. The vote on the net neutrality amendment is not expected until later this evening.

They are considering 8 amendments(each which will have 10 to 20 mins of debate) and then a vote on each amendment.
The "net neutrality" amendment is number 7.

Here is a link that lists the 8 amendments:
»thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/R···1(hr491)

--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: Debate in progress on CSPAN on COPE Act

Text of "Net Neutrality" Amendment:

7. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE MARKEY OF MASSACHUSETTS, OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 20 MINUTES

Strike section 201 of the bill and insert the following:

SECTION 201. NETWORK NEUTRALITY.

(a) Amendment- Title VII of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

`SEC. 715. NETWORK NEUTRALITY.

`(a) Policy- It is the policy of the United States--

`(1) to maintain and enhance the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the Internet and Internet services, upon which Internet commerce relies;

`(2) to preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the Internet and consumer empowerment and choice;

`(3) to foster innovation, investment, and competition among network providers, as well as application, content, and service providers;

`(4) to ensure vigorous and prompt enforcement of this section's requirements to safeguard innovation, consumer protection, and marketplace certainty; and

`(5) to preserve the security and reliability of the Internet and the services that enable consumers to access content, applications, and services over the Internet.

`(b) In General- Each broadband network provider has the duty--

`(1) not to block, impair, degrade, discriminate against, or interfere with the ability of any person to use a broadband connection to access, use, send, receive, or offer lawful content, applications, or services over the Internet;

`(2) to operate its broadband network in a nondiscriminatory manner so that any person can offer or provide content, applications, and services through, or over, such broadband network with equivalent or better capability than the provider extends to itself or affiliated parties, and without the imposition of a charge for such nondiscriminatory network operation;

`(3) if the provider prioritizes or offers enhanced quality of service to data of a particular type, to prioritize or offer enhanced quality of service to all data of that type (regardless of the origin of such data) without imposing a surcharge or other consideration for such prioritization or enhanced quality of service;

`(4) to enable a user to attach and use any device to the operator's network that does not physically damage, make unauthorized use of, or materially degrade other users' utilization of, the network; and

`(5) to clearly and conspicuously disclose to users, in plain language, accurate information about the speed, nature, and limitations of their broadband connection.

`(c) Preserved Rights and Exceptions- Nothing in this section shall prevent a broadband network provider from taking reasonable and nondiscriminatory measures to--

`(1) manage the functioning of its network to protect the security of such network and broadband network services, provided that such management does not depend upon the affiliation with the broadband network provider of the content, applications, or services on the network;

`(2) offer varied service plans to users at defined levels of bandwidth and different prices;

`(3) offer consumer protection services (including services for the prevention of unsolicited commercial electronic messages, parental controls, or other similar capabilities), or offer cable service, so long as a user may refuse or disable such services;

`(4) give priority to emergency communications and telemedicine services; or

`(5) prevent any violation of Federal or State law, or comply with any court-ordered law enforcement directive.

`(d) Expedited Complaint Process- Within 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Commission shall prescribe regulations providing for the expedited review of any complaints alleging a violation of this section. Such regulations shall include a requirement that the Commission issue a final order regarding any request for a ruling contained in a complaint not later than 30 days after the date of submission of such complaint.

`(e) Definitions- As used in this section:

`(1) BROADBAND NETWORK PROVIDER- The term `broadband network provider' means a person or entity that owns, controls, operates, or resells and controls any facility used to provide broadband network service to the public, by whatever technology and whether provided for a fee, in exchange for an explicit benefit, or for free.

`(2) BROADBAND NETWORK SERVICE- The term `broadband network service' means a two-way transmission service that connects to the Internet and transmits information at an average rate of at least 200 kilobits per second in at least one direction.

`(3) USER- The term `user' means any person who takes and uses broadband network service, whether provided for a fee, in exchange for an explicit benefit, or for free.'.

(b) Savings Provision- Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify, impair, or supersede the applicability of the antitrust laws, as such term is defined in section 602(e)(4) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

In the heading of title II of the bill, strike `ENFORCEMENT OF BROADBAND POLICY STATEMENT' and insert `NETWORK NEUTRALITY'.

Conform the table of contents accordingly.

--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Amendment passed to HR 5252 on VOIP USF possibility

Amendment 8 to HR 5252 passed on voice vote to give the FCC the authority to extend the Universal Service Fund(USF) to VOIP services. That doesn't mean it will. Just that they would be given the authority to do so.

Many speakers on this amendment mentioned that another bill will be considered to revamp the whole USF completely at a later date.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page
Zoder

join:2002-04-16
Miami, FL

Re: Amendment passed to HR 5252 on VOIP USF possibility

Amendment 8 also includes intercarrier compensation along with the USF you mentioned above.

Michieru2
zzz zzz zzz
Premium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL
The USF Tax has no purpose anymore since now telco's and ISP's can choose where they can deploy. So extending this tax to VOIP has no purpose what so ever.

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Amendment 6 passes giving FCC authority on net neutrality

Amendment 6 passes by a vote of 353 to 68.
6. Smith, Lamar (TX): Clarifies that the language in section 201 (i.e. the new section 7l5(b)(3) of the Communications Act) that gives exclusive authority to the FCC to adjudicate complaints concerning network neutrality does not affect the applicability of the antitrust laws to cases involving network neutrality or the jurisdiction of the courts to hear such cases.
This gives FCC power to decide on net neutrality issues. But doesn't change power of justice dept to look at net neutrality issues where antitrust laws are concerned.

Amendment 7 would put specific "net neutrality" language in bill HR 5252. This vote comes up next. It is expected to fail, thereby leaving the FCC to determine what net neutrality is or isn't.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page
Zoder

join:2002-04-16
Miami, FL

Re: Amendment 6 passes giving FCC authority on net neutrality

If 5252 passes, there is still the Senate vote. If they approve of net neutrality in their version it will need to be worked out in committee. Probably won't get that far though.

What I learned from watching the debate on C=Span is that Rep. Gonzalez is a complete tool of AT&T. But what do you expect from the congressman from San Antonio. The biggest joke was his amendment that failed to be passed by the Rules committee yesterday that would have forced net neutrality on the content providers instead of the network providers.

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


2 edits

Amendment 7 fails adding specific net neutrality language

Amendment 7, which would have added specific net neutrality language to Bill HR5252, failed by a vote of 269 to 152.
7. Markey (MA)/Eshoo (CA)/Boucher (VA)/Inslee (WA): Seeks to restore important non-discrimination requirements enforced by the Federal Communications Commission that from the inception of the Internet until August of 2005 were binding on telecommunications carriers. This amendment essentially has 3 parts: provides a policy statement in addition to the general duties of broadband network providers; provides for preserved rights and exceptions to the general statutory duties in the first part; and provides an expedited complaint process and an antitrust savings clause.
Basically this defeat means that net neutrality advocates failed to get specific legal language in the bill guaranteeing net neutrality.

Since this amendment failed, net neutrality will be determined by the FCC on a case by case basis if this Bill ever makes it into law.

The next vote will be on the bill itself. An up or down on HR 5252 with the amendments added today.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


3 edits

HR 5252 passes by a vote of 321 to 101

HR 5252 has passed by a vote of 321 to 101 and must be passed by the Senate or reconciled with a different Senate bill in a conference committee. No date has been set yet for these actions. Given the limited amount of time in the current Senate legislative schedule, no broadband bill may make it into law this year.

The law as passed would set up a national video franchise system overriding local laws; let the FCC determine what net neutrality is on a case by case basis; and let the FCC extend the USF to VOIP if it so desires.

P.S.> 106 Democrats voted for HR 5252.

P.P.S.> If any Senate bill moves forward this year it will likely be S.2686 sponsored by Sen Ted Stevens of Alaska. It would be very similar to the House bill according to Stevens.
»thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z···s.02686:

--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page
Forums » House to Vote on Net-Neutrality COPE Amendment« ...  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 04:51:54 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [60] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [48] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [36] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [31] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [25] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [22] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [4] Monday Evening Links
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· AsteriskNow vs PBX in a Flash vs Trixbox [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]