republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Unlimited is Limited » There is no free lunch.
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Confused? Bandwidth restrictions? »
« VZW...  
AuthorAll Replies


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to kamm
Re: There is no free lunch.

said by kamm See Profile :

Those "abusers" - and whatever retarded stupid names come out of these greedy bloodsucker corporations - are the ones who are pushing the envelope constantly.
More quotes from the Communist Manifesto( »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Manifesto )??
Do you ever tire of beating that drum?
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page


batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to kamm
said by kamm See Profile :



Those "abusers" - and whatever retarded stupid names come out of these greedy bloodsucker corporations - are the ones who are pushing the envelope constantly.
If they weren't, we would be still using ISDN on Compuserve.
Actually business has been pushing the envelope. One could get any speed fiber connection one wants. It has been that way for years. They get a guaranteed speed up and down with a one hour time to fix an outage. There are many companies that will provide that service. It costs more then $29.99 a month and there is no government interference.
There is no free lunch.


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US

reply to batterup
said by batterup See Profile :

Someone has to pay for the bandwidth. Cable companies with their coaxial network limit customer use of bandwidth. They always have and always will. They use different methods but they all do it. The limits only effect about 17% of the users, or ABUSERS as Cablevision calls them. That 17% slows down the network for the other 83%.

That leaves three choices, let the network run slowly for 100%, limit the use of 17% or upgrade the network at a great expense so 17% can use what they want. Most of us here would prefer the latter but with government regulation we will get the first.
The problem is that it's simply greed, nothing else - they don't want to invest more back to upgrade their network.

Those "abusers" - and whatever retarded stupid names come out of these greedy bloodsucker corporations - are the ones who are pushing the envelope constantly.
If they weren't, we would be still using ISDN on Compuserve.
Forums » Unlimited is LimitedConfused? Bandwidth restrictions? »
« VZW...  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 06:35:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [60] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [48] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [36] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [31] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [25] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [22] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [4] Monday Evening Links
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· Why is VoIP Better than POTS? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· [Rant] called out sick! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]