BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:
 ·Comcast
| reply to deepblackmag
Re: FIRST POST
said by deepblackmag  :I agree its not as reliable, however it IS cheap and already there. And thats what matters here. You really wanna know the cost analysis of it ? Verizon when the fiber is completely rolled out to a neighborhood can pull down the copper at its own discretion and scrap it for almost 2/3 the price of the fiber. Severely reducing the costs of running the fiber the rest of the way.
I find it amazing that they don't do this. When an area is lit with fiber give the people a free install of new service, pull all the copper and scrap it. And lower the peoples bills by $2 a month and consider it a free "upgrade". I mean really think of it as getting a faster return on your money.
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" |
|
deepblackmag
join:2004-12-27
00000 | reply to toadlife
I agree its not as reliable, however it IS cheap and already there. And thats what matters here. |
|
toadlife
Premium
join:2004-05-03
Lemoore, CA
 ·AT&T Yahoo
| reply to deepblackmag
said by deepblackmag :WRONG WRONG WRONG The last mile thats in the ground RIGHT NOW can handle it. The twisted pairs and coax is just fine, the only problem is the equipment at their substations and in peoples houses. Upgrade that and they are good to go. You dont need fiber for 100mbps. The copper thats there work just fine. Sure if you tack enough equipment onto copper to keep the signal/noise ratio down, you may be able to push 100mbits of data through it, but it won't be very reliable and it will probably be more expensive to keep up than just running fiber.
Copper is not reliable, it has major distance limitations, and can't hold one millionth of the bandwidth that fiber can. It's a dead end medium. The sooner is goes away, the better.
--
Have problems running your Windows box as a limited user?
Try this...»winsudo.toadlife.net |
|
