 fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20
| reply to footballdude Re: I Confess!
Yea... Bush gave us his supreme court. Unfortunately for him his two new pawns have not been kissing his butt.
As the constitution says that the Church may not participate. (Again, you are not paying attention to what I said - just spewing more garbage) The "CHURCH" enjoys it's tax exempt status but that comes at a price. If the church wants to participate in the process of law making, then they pay taxes like everyone else. The "Church" is riding a fine line all the time. In Minnesota, "The Church" is constantly having meetings and getting involved in politics directly.. just thank god their participation is being looked at by the right people.
This ends our discussion.. there's never any consclusion with a religious fanatic since this type always has an answer excuse for everything right or wrong. |
|
  footballdude Premium join:2002-08-13 Imperial, MO
| reply to RadioDoc said by RadioDoc :Religion in government is inherently amoral. You don't seem to be able to grasp that. Because it's ungraspable. The vast majority of governments in this world exist purely to exploit those that they govern. That's what's amoral. Allowing religious people (who ARE the majority in America) to have a say in what kind of society we will be and what rules we'll live by isn't. Denying that would be.
It seems to me you're saying you'll live by whatever rules the government comes up with, as long as it wasn't a bunch of Christians who came up with them. You don't really want to go there, do you? -- What's certain about Darwinism is that it would take less time for (1) a single-celled organism to evolve into a human being through mutation and natural selection than for (2) Darwinists to admit they have no proof of (1) - Ann Coulter |
|
  footballdude Premium join:2002-08-13 Imperial, MO
| reply to fiberguy said by fiberguy :Bush ran his election based on tugging at the christian right.. and today, it's the very belief that he let them down. Bush did one thing for the Christian right. He gave us the Supreme Court.
said by fiberguy :To the reason why this country was founded, it may have been founded by christians with certain values in mind, but the constitution disagrees that this is a religious state we have here and in the end, that's all that matters. The Constitution states that there will be no official state religion. It doesn't say religious people aren't allowed to participate in making the rules. -- What's certain about Darwinism is that it would take less time for (1) a single-celled organism to evolve into a human being through mutation and natural selection than for (2) Darwinists to admit they have no proof of (1) - Ann Coulter |
|
 fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20
| reply to footballdude I'm beginning to think you need to learn about your own religion's history. The church against the death penalty? I guess many god fearing christians need to pay better attention to their god's message and listen then. MANY christians are on the side of taking a criminals life. Haven't you watched Fox News lately? Just one example... a few bad apples? Nope... but I am not surprised to see this explained away as a few rogue bad apples..
Just like many good christians like to hate others.
To the reason why this country was founded, it may have been founded by christians with certain values in mind, but the constitution disagrees that this is a religious state we have here and in the end, that's all that matters.
You need to read some history books as this government did NOT EVER start out as full religion, though many religious people would like to believe it to be true. This country was found on the fact that they were trying to escape religious persecution and the tyrany of not being able to worship on their own. If you want to see and or know where the role of the church in this country belongs, just look back about 6 to 10 years... you must be blind if you can't see people more and more trying to push religion into the public place and policy. Bush ran his election based on tugging at the christian right.. and today, it's the very belief that he let them down.
You don't get out much do you? |
|
  tiger72 SexaT duorP Premium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO clubs: | reply to pnh102 i see people talking past each other |
|
 RadioDoc 58ef2c0 Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| reply to footballdude said by footballdude : Dogma? At what point have I degenerated into dogma? Let me reiterate what I said before. If there is no God, then there is no reason you shouldn't do whatever you want in life, so long as you don't get caught. This is expediency, not morality. Yes, some religious people are complete idiots. Again, people are flawed, which is why we must look to something greater than ourselves. You presume that we are all incapable of controlling ourselves unless we believe in some all-powerful cosmic muffin?
I am quite sure that many "godless heathen" manage to not murder, rape and plunder every day. I am also quite sure that many of the so-called "god-fearing" do in fact murder, rape and plunder every day.
You can present no evidence that atheists believe "there is no reason you shouldn't do whatever you want in life, so long as you don't get caught". Assuming that a "god" is required for someone to have a conscience and live a moral life is patently absurd.
I'll say it again: Religion is an outgrowth of morality. Morality can and does exist quite nicely outside of religion. Religion does not guarantee morals. Religion in government is inherently amoral. You don't seem to be able to grasp that. -- Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
  footballdude Premium join:2002-08-13 Imperial, MO
| reply to RadioDoc said by RadioDoc :Backward? Man, when do you not toe the party line? Party line? I thought we were discussing one of the basic philosophies of life. I'm not even sure what you mean when you say 'party line'.
said by RadioDoc :How you manage to mangle that into some kind of religious dogma is pretty fascinating. I'll reiterate that religion is not a prerequisite for moral behavior. It can be a guide, but it's not required. Some "deeply religious" people are utterly amoral. Dogma? At what point have I degenerated into dogma? Let me reiterate what I said before. If there is no God, then there is no reason you shouldn't do whatever you want in life, so long as you don't get caught. This is expediency, not morality. Yes, some religious people are complete idiots. Again, people are flawed, which is why we must look to something greater than ourselves.
said by RadioDoc :Now that I've seen your posting signature, however, I understand your position. Ann Coulter is your god. Perfect example of an amoral 'religious' leech. Ann Coulter is my god? Now you're just being mean. Regardless of your views on evolution, that quote is funny. Lighten up. -- What's certain about Darwinism is that it would take less time for (1) a single-celled organism to evolve into a human being through mutation and natural selection than for (2) Darwinists to admit they have no proof of (1) - Ann Coulter |
|
 RadioDoc 58ef2c0 Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| reply to footballdude Backward? Man, when do you not toe the party line?
Here's Merriam Webster's definition. Maybe they are backward, too...
Main Entry: mo·ral·i·ty Pronunciation: m&-'ra-l&-tE, mo- Function: noun Inflected Form(s): plural -ties 1 a : a moral discourse, statement, or lesson b : a literary or other imaginative work teaching a moral lesson 2 a : a doctrine or system of moral conduct b plural : particular moral principles or rules of conduct 3 : conformity to ideals of right human conduct 4 : moral conduct : VIRTUE And just to be thorough...
Main Entry: mor·al Pronunciation: 'mor-&l, 'mär- Function: adjective Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French, from Latin moralis, from mor-, mos custom 1 a : of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior : ETHICAL b : expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior c : conforming to a standard of right behavior d : sanctioned by or operative on one's conscience or ethical judgment e : capable of right and wrong action 2 : probable though not proved : VIRTUAL 3 : having the effects of such on the mind, confidence, or will - mor·al·ly /-&-lE/ adverb synonyms MORAL, ETHICAL, VIRTUOUS, RIGHTEOUS, NOBLE mean conforming to a standard of what is right and good. MORAL implies conformity to established sanctioned codes or accepted notions of right and wrong . ETHICAL may suggest the involvement of more difficult or subtle questions of rightness, fairness, or equity . VIRTUOUS implies the possession or manifestation of moral excellence in character . RIGHTEOUS stresses guiltlessness or blamelessness and often suggests the sanctimonious . NOBLE implies moral eminence and freedom from anything petty, mean, or dubious in conduct and character . How you manage to mangle that into some kind of religious dogma is pretty fascinating. I'll reiterate that religion is not a prerequisite for moral behavior. It can be a guide, but it's not required. Some "deeply religious" people are utterly amoral.
Now that I've seen your posting signature, however, I understand your position. Ann Coulter is your god. Perfect example of an amoral 'religious' leech.
Have a nice life. Stay out of mine. -- Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
  footballdude Premium join:2002-08-13 Imperial, MO
| reply to fiberguy said by fiberguy :So, footballdude, since the church believes murder is immoral, how does the church explain away the death penalty? There are many documented cases where Christians stand by the death penalty at every turn. Last I looked, most Christian churches (including Catholics) were AGAINST the death penalty.
said by fiberguy :Shall I point you to the state of North Carolina where a prosecutor, who happens to be a good standing christian, was proved with out a doubt to have with held evidence that would have cleared the very innocent man he tried and put on death row to die? He was innocent all along, but that christian - as many others - blindly stood by him to see this man die. I guess this blows apart your murder is wrong story, huh? We know Christians have 'the' answer for everything, right? With billions of Christians on the planet, there's bound to be a few bad apples. I'm beginning to think you don't know anything at all about Christianity. We believe GOD has all the answers, not each of us.
All of this is besides the point, anyway. This started by your complaining that too much religion is being pushed into government and my pointing out that this government was put together by a group of deeply religious people for the purpose of governing a population of deeply religious people. Certainly things have changed over the last two hundred years but I don't think you can reasonably state that someone is 'pushing religion into government' when the government started out full of religion. -- What's certain about Darwinism is that it would take less time for (1) a single-celled organism to evolve into a human being through mutation and natural selection than for (2) Darwinists to admit they have no proof of (1) - Ann Coulter |
|
  footballdude Premium join:2002-08-13 Imperial, MO
| reply to RadioDoc said by RadioDoc :The concepts of morality and civility are not defined by religion, however religions very well might be defined by their morality and civility. You've got your cart before the horse. Wow, is that backward. The whole point of religion is to define morality. You find out who God is and what he wants from you and attempt to apply it to everyday life. If someone doesn't believe in something bigger than them, then there is no right and wrong, only what's expedient. -- What's certain about Darwinism is that it would take less time for (1) a single-celled organism to evolve into a human being through mutation and natural selection than for (2) Darwinists to admit they have no proof of (1) - Ann Coulter |
|
  pnh102 Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast
| reply to xdeadhead said by xdeadhead :i simply must get a job there. how do "they" recruit new applicants? oh wait, the phone is ringing...... The first rule about NSA Secret Rooms is... You will fight! -- Tancredo 2008! |
|
  Cuchulainn The Roar of the Masses Could be Farts
join:2000-11-09 Chevy Chase, MD
·Verizon FIOS
| reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :said by airoff :"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" Benjamin Franklin This quote is trotted out at least once a week here. It is overused and barely relevant in the modern world of terrorism. Besides, no essential liberties are being given up, and to describe the threat to security as temporary is mistaken. Spoken like someone who swallows the whole flawed Bush line, hook, line, sinker, rod and reel, and maybe stops just short of Bush's nuts.
How is freedom not relevant in the "modern world of terrorism?" Are you saying that all freedom and liberty is off the table because this administration is too stupid to know how to deal with a decentralized group like Al Qaeda and is flailing wildly to try and come up with some way of dealing with it?
As for the threat to security being permanent, isn't that exactly what Big Brother argued in 1984? "Oceania has always been at war with East Asia." A "permanent" threat justifies a permanent assault on liberty. This is no more permanent a threat than were the terrorist threats of the '70s (or can you remember that?). There was no wholesale assault on liberty after OKC was there???
Funny how you right wing types will always back those "wise old dead white guys" when they talk about morals or religion but not uncomfortable subjects like freedom.... -- the jam econo...makes a stench. |
|
 attsbcisgay
join:2003-03-18 Beverly Hills, CA
| reply to kimmer7 said by kimmer7 :Wow, what a rant. Now if it was only true, it would be have been pretty good. Maintained power through fear and hate? I will not disagree that there is hate and fear in America, but I think it has more to do with certain people flying planes into buildings and killing 3,000 US citizens. The same certain people who have vowed in the media to attack us again. Rewritten laws to grant more power to the executive branch? Sorry, you need a civics lesson. The president doesnt write laws, nor does he pass laws. Congress does that, a congress that is full of people who disagree with President Bush. Setup and sanctioned torture of "enemy combatants? Um, I would be real interested in seeing where you get this from. I haven't seen a single shred of proof anywhere that President Bush setup and sanctioned torture. Are you talking about the guy in Guantanamo being forced to wear a bra on his head? I feel so sorry for him, his life must be hell. I will be sure to think of that while I pray for the poor soldiers who were mutilated and boobytrapped by the "freedom fighters" of Iraq. I guess we have different ideas of what Torture is. As for what some stupid soldiers did for fun at Abu Ghraib, 9 different investigations showed that stacking people in naked pyramids was not policy directed by the whitehouse. So yes, claiming the USA right now is similiar to early Nazi Germany is grossly stupid. But some people know more about the history then either of us do so they maybe correct about the nature of the event being repeated again, cause no one had done their homework or learned from history. History is bound to repeat itself again whether you notice it or not. To consolidate power... If knowledge is power then you must seek it but do not use it for evil purpose, absolute power corrupts all including those who were once good. If they can get away with mass murdering people behind our back, why is it not possible? What's to stop them? The clueless bunch like ya say it couldn't happen or are asleep. It's not visible to the naked eye since it is all being done privately and using mass persuasion to convince the average citizen that its ok to invade their privacy.
I must wake you up before it is too late...
Better late then never. |
|
  xdeadhead 220, 221, Whatever It Takes. Premium join:2000-11-08 Mechanicsburg, PA | reply to dslhater i simply must get a job there. how do "they" recruit new applicants?
oh wait, the phone is ringing...... -- I am not herbert. |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to airoff said by airoff :"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" Benjamin Franklin This quote is trotted out at least once a week here. It is overused and barely relevant in the modern world of terrorism. Besides, no essential liberties are being given up, and to describe the threat to security as temporary is mistaken. -- -- Join Red Room Forum BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com My Web Page |
|
  airoff I'd Rather Be Sleeping Premium join:2001-08-03 West Branch, IA | reply to pnh102 "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security"
Benjamin Franklin |
|
 fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20
| reply to footballdude ...and atheists and non-Christians believe it's immoral to have state sponsored death penalties too. (Just taking a crack at where the majority is when it comes to applying the death penalty in this country)..
So, footballdude, since the church believes murder is immoral, how does the church explain away the death penalty? There are many documented cases where Christians stand by the death penalty at every turn. Oh wait, it's only for criminals, right? The non-innocent. Please tell me again how many innocent people have been put to death again? Shall I point you to the state of North Carolina where a prosecutor, who happens to be a good standing christian, was proved with out a doubt to have with held evidence that would have cleared the very innocent man he tried and put on death row to die? He was innocent all along, but that christian - as many others - blindly stood by him to see this man die.
I guess this blows apart your murder is wrong story, huh? We know Christians have 'the' answer for everything, right? |
|
  nixen Rockin' the Boxen Premium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| reply to N3OGH said by N3OGH :said by willp1 :I guess you must be no brianer because it is all ready happing!!!!!!!!!!!Lookat the Patrocic act IS IT????Yeah, right now, at the bequest of the Bush administration, and under the authorization of the Patriot Act, millions of people are being gassed in waterless showers, and shoved in crematoriums, some still alive. Right now, Donald Rumsfeld has a lampshade made from human skin, and millions of gypsies, Poles, Solvaks, Jews, Russians, and homosexuals are toiling away in slave camps to make vengeance weapons so Bush can take over the world. Sorry, you may not like the present administration in power, you may very well hate them. But, the fact that you can freely speak out against them and not end up a jar of ashes floating down the river Rhine is proof enough that comparing it to the Nazi state is nothing but the pointless drivel of an undisputed ass hat. First, not saying we're a "nazi state."
That said, it's not like the most egregious excesses of Nazi Germany were there from day one.
-tom -- "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." -Louis D Brandeis |
|
 kimmer7
join:2006-06-02 Tampa, FL
| reply to Camelot One Wow, what a rant. Now if it was only true, it would be have been pretty good.
Maintained power through fear and hate? I will not disagree that there is hate and fear in America, but I think it has more to do with certain people flying planes into buildings and killing 3,000 US citizens. The same certain people who have vowed in the media to attack us again. Rewritten laws to grant more power to the executive branch? Sorry, you need a civics lesson. The president doesnt write laws, nor does he pass laws. Congress does that, a congress that is full of people who disagree with President Bush. Setup and sanctioned torture of "enemy combatants? Um, I would be real interested in seeing where you get this from. I haven't seen a single shred of proof anywhere that President Bush setup and sanctioned torture. Are you talking about the guy in Guantanamo being forced to wear a bra on his head? I feel so sorry for him, his life must be hell. I will be sure to think of that while I pray for the poor soldiers who were mutilated and boobytrapped by the "freedom fighters" of Iraq. I guess we have different ideas of what Torture is. As for what some stupid soldiers did for fun at Abu Ghraib, 9 different investigations showed that stacking people in naked pyramids was not policy directed by the whitehouse.
So yes, claiming the USA right now is similiar to early Nazi Germany is grossly stupid. |
|
  anonpisser
@optonline.net | reply to pnh102 or could it by the 1984 Denver Broncos! |
|