  Edit This Premium join:2001-05-08
| Rule-Breaking Resizing for Poster-Sized Prints
This is an excerpt from Scott Kelby's "The Photoshop CS2 book for digital photographers"
Rule-Breaking Resizing for Poster-Sized Prints This is a resizing technique I learned from my friend (and world-famous nature photographer) Vincent Versace. His poster-sized prints (24x36") always look so sharp and crisp but we're both shooting with the same 6-megapixel camera so I had to ask him his secret. I figured he was using some scaling plug-in, but he said he does the whole thing in Photoshop. My thanks to Vinny for sharing his simple, yet brilliant technique with me, so I could share it with you.
Step One Open the photo you want to resize, then go under the Image menu and choose Image Size. By the way, in Photoshop CS2 there's now finally a keyboard shortcut to get to the Image Size dialog: Command-Option-I (PC: Control-Alt-I).
Step Two Type in the dimensions you want as your final print size. My original width for my 6-megapixel image is just a hair over 10", so when I type 36" for the Width, the Height field will automatically adjust to around 24" (the Width and Height are linked proportionally by default adjust one and the other adjusts in kind). Of course, not all images scale perfectly, so depending on how many megapixels your camera is, you may not be able to get exactly 24" (and in fact, you may not want to go that big, but if you do, you might need to enter more than 36" to make your Height reach 24", and then you can go back and crop your Width down to 36" [see the "Cropping to a Specific Size" technique earlier in this chapter]).
Step Three Once your size is in place, you'll need to adjust your resolution upward, so go to the Resolution field and enter 360. Now, you know and I know that this goes against every tried-and-true rule of resolution, and breaks the "never-just-type-in-a-higher-number-with-the-Resample-Image-checkbox-turned-on" rule that we all live and die by, but stick with me on this one you've got to try it to believe it. So, type it in, grit your teeth, but don't click OK yet.
Step Four Back in Photoshop CS, Adobe introduced some new sampling algorithms for resizing images, and according to Vincent's research, the key to this resizing technique is to not use the sampling method Adobe recommends (which is Bicubic Smooth), and instead to choose Bicubic Sharper in the Resample Image pop-up menu, which actually provides better results so much so that Vincent claims that the printed results are not only just as good, but perhaps better than those produced by the expensive, fancy-schmancy upsizing plug-ins.
Step Five I've tried this technique numerous times, and I have to say the results are pretty stunning. But don't take my word for it click OK, print it out, and see for yourself. Here's the final image resized to 36x24" (you can see the size in the rulers by pressing Command-R [PC: Control-R]).
The words above are from the superb Scott Kelby book. I HIGHLY recommend it to anyone who owns Photoshop. -- I post therefore I am. |
|
  JRSlater8 Do or do not... there is no try Premium join:2004-08-12 | Very nice tip. Thank you! |
|
  iSpark Capturing Memories Making Dreams Premium join:2000-07-17 Conway, SC | Awesome tip! thanks ET |
|
  Gemologist Premium join:2001-11-15 USA clubs: 
| reply to Edit This This is the method I used to use as well when the need arose. It is every bit as good as GF. Now I tend to use my own Program I wrote that uses a different Algorithm then Adobe offers. -- My Pbase Gallery
What is RSD? |
|
 dadarkside Premium join:2006-05-20 The Moon | reply to Edit This How does this work in PS 7? Are similar algorithems available?
At work, gotta go home and try this out in PS 7 now... |
|
  Gemologist Premium join:2001-11-15 USA clubs: 
| said by dadarkside :How does this work in PS 7? Are similar algorithems available? At work, gotta go home and try this out in PS 7 now... No, the algorithms are not available in PS7  -- My Pbase Gallery
What is RSD? |
|
  dandelion Premium,MVM join:2003-04-29 Germantown, TN clubs: | reply to Edit This Wonder if a similar technique would work trying to upsize something as small as an avatar? |
|
  Edit This Premium join:2001-05-08
| said by dandelion :Wonder if a similar technique would work trying to upsize something as small as an avatar? It's worth a shot. -- I post therefore I am. |
|
  suntken34 'twas an inside job Premium join:2002-09-02 IA Cornfield | reply to Edit This No Kiddin! Nice post, Kelby's 'da man! |
|
  simpfan742 People Call Me Andrew. Premium join:2003-05-18 Belmar, NJ
1 edit | reply to Edit This I used this method to upscale a 20x30 @ 118 dpi to 360 dpi and the result was phenomenal. If anyone's interested in making good posters... I highly recommend it. This should be added to the FAQ.
Edit: I have to say how great the MPIX Metallic Paper is as well. -- My Gallery |
|
  jordan f Premium join:2002-06-27 Miami, FL
| reply to Edit This Speaking of poster sized prints..winkflash.com has 40% off all poster-sized prints using this coupon code: MD82HG92
I've never used Winkflash, and this deal may end at any time, but it's worth a shot at 40% off I say. I'm gonna order some 24 x 36s. -- MY PHOTOBLOG |
|
  Gemologist Premium join:2001-11-15 USA clubs: 
| Winkflash's posters aren't too bad. Their actual photographic prints and Photobooks really rock! We use them all the time. -- My Pbase Gallery
What is RSD? |
|
  Pretorious Theres more behind the pic than the wall Premium,MVM join:2003-01-08 clubs:  
·Verizon Online DSL
| reply to Edit This I've been using Winkflash very frequently, just received several 18x24 prints that were just perfect results and I was extremely pleased with. I've never been let down by them yet. Wouldn't you know though that a couple days after I receive my large prints they start the 40% off thing.  -- My other Gallery |
|
  Hayward K A R - 1 2 0 C Premium join:2000-07-13 Key West, FL
2 edits | reply to Edit This Other than the sampling options that is what I have always done with PS that (not sure the option you mention is avail. in 7)... and again good results up to 20x30 from a 1.4MB NASA space station file of Key West. -- »haywardm.com (Hayward's Key West)
|
|
 acmeco
join:2002-01-25 Phoenix, AZ
| reply to Edit This I used to "rez up" my 16x20 or larger prints before sending them to the lab, however I suggest trying it both ways...
Run some tests. IMO, there is NO NEED to rez up a 6mp capture when printing larger. Also, most larger photographic (not inkjet) prints are printed on a Durst Lambda, a Lightjet, or possibly a Chromera.
ANY of these printers will do just find with a normal 6capture sent to them in .jpg (if you want to do your edit in .psd, .tiff, etc that's great, but sending a tiff to your lab is slow thru the net and a jpg 12 prints the same without bogging down their printer)
A lightjet printer is NOT cheap and their software and drivers will rez up any file "on the fly" I think a $300 K (or whatever they cost) printer is going to do a better job than a $600 copy of photoshop.
What is more important is a clean capture with good lighting and other post production processes. Using other tools to "pop" your image and a good unsharp mask formula, etc.
Here is a quote from one of the Labs in Phoenix which I use:
»www.mightyimaging.com/faqs.html
--------quote-------- For large prints should I really leave the resolution blank?
We recommend not changing the image resolution, unless you are working with a layered Photoshop file to begin with. Our equipment will resample the image for printing. A good analogy to this is a balloon, when you resample the file at your end you are blowing up a balloon, making it larger and harder to deal with as it gets transferred to us. Leave the balloon flat and let us blow it up. On the other hand, if your image has text, is a multi-image panel print, or you want to sharpen and perform extra work on the image, please resample the image to the final size to insure sharp text and the best results. -----end quote--------
Anyway, I am not sayign that the upsize method does not work, just saying that 200DPI works great, heck 150 does too and that many lab's have better technology that works "on the fly"
Adam Nollmeyer Acme Photography »www.flickr.com/photos/acmephoto/ »www.acmephoto.blogspot.com/ |
|