TheOtherPete
join:2001-06-28
Boyds, MD | I don't believe it
This has been posted for 2 hours and none of the usual NARAD fan-boys have piped up about how NARAD will offer 100/100Mbps for cablevision users and is available now?
Amazing. |
|
Hellrazor
join:2002-02-02
Abyss | Health risks of 100mb
What will the nerdlings do with 100mb? Insurance rates will go up from all the injuries to their wrists from the p0rn streams. |
|
Transmaster
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus
join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY
 ·Qwest.net
| I see
I see...Yes...perhaps in the next 50 years 100Mbps |
 |
|
majortom1981
join:2004-08-26
Lindenhurst, NY | reply to TheOtherPete
Re: I don't believe it
Well IF you go by this article cablevision does have some deployments of 100/100 too. |
|
brooklynman4
join:2004-09-07
Brooklyn, NY | Only thing i can think of if verizon coverts its copper to fiber. Its possible since they got MCI`s equipment now. |
|
dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
| reply to TheOtherPete
said by TheOtherPete  :This has been posted for 2 hours and none of the usual NARAD fan-boys have piped up about how NARAD will offer 100/100Mbps for cablevision users and is available now? Amazing. And if you upload it'll be capped to 100000/150. CV is a joke. i'd take DSL if my choices were DSL or OOL.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth |
|
Zurish
@cableone.net
| reply to Transmaster
Re: I see
Lost in broadband.
Sure we could fly around the web at breakneck speeds, however the gear (Juniper Networks Routers and switches) on the internet has to have better bandwidth to take advantage of this tech. When you look at the major trunks of fiber going across the nation, No one within a few years would be able to reasonably use this day in and day out. IE routed one day fine and the next, through crappy equipment. Its only good as the backbone. I give it 5 years. Also consumers are looking at the price point. In order for this to work wide spread, the average ISP (Cable/telco) must see a reasonable return on thier existing investments. Those who ran fiber (to closer to destination.) are better off than the telco who relies on thier copper to reach the farthest distance. Most fiber has been already run by the cable companies. I think WI-MAX will wipe any dsl off the map. Less cost to ISP to maintain and better return on investment. Also there is a wireless linux handheld using VOIP coming to you in the next couple of years. Why do you think Verizon is doing this? Cellphone technology is dated and perfectly positioned for WI-MAX..... Think about it. |
|
itsajoke
@rr.com | reply to dvd536
Re: I don't believe it
hmm strange how can u write anything anout cablevision while u are out of their area |
|
Netbum
join:2002-04-08
Oakley, CA | reply to Transmaster
Re: I see
50 and 100 Mbps download cable modems will be few in North America until 2008
2008? Yeah right  |
|
