Re: What he says isn't wrong.

Author	All Replies
RadioDoc 58ef2c0 Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11 ·AT&T Midwest 1 edit	reply to Karl Bode Re: What he says isn't wrong. Anyone besides me see irony in the technical quality increasing while the program quality decreases at an even faster rate? If I want "reality" I'll look out my window. Cuban's a tool, but until someone figures out how to efficiently broadcast real HD content to millions of Internet receivers at a time at a cost comparable to current television he's right. Even cable companies have come to this realization, pushing their digital distribution deeper into the network to save bandwidth. Broadcast technology (yeah, even good old OTA) is far superior to individual connections to each receiver since it costs the same to transmit to one viewer as it costs for ten million. Imagine HBO having to run a separate cable to every subscriber. That's essentially what we've got now for Internet video. It is grossly inefficient. True multicast would help. Where'd that end up anyway? edit: word order -- Toolmaster of La Grange.
	to forum · permalink · · 2006-07-14 13:38:42 ·
wwdubbia join:2002-06-03 Clinton, NY	said by RadioDoc : Anyone besides me see irony in the technical quality increasing while the program quality decreases at an even faster rate? If I want "reality" I'll look out my window. I think it's a natural byproduct. You have to produce more content faster... quality is bound to suffer.
wwdubbia join:2002-06-03 Clinton, NY	to forum · permalink · · 2006-07-14 16:16:53 ·


Wednesday, 09-Dec 22:35:02	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. republican-creole page compression OFF